By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Wii U- what would have been considered borderline?

Suppose the Wii U didn't fail as badly as it did. Instead, it simply was 50-50. Not too bad, but anything memorable. 

How many sales would it have needed to reach? Currently, the Wii U is at 13 million. It trails the Xbox One by 8 million, with the PS4 twenty-seven million units ahead.

I'd have to say that selling 30-50 million units would have been considered the line between success and failure. It's legacy would be mixed, but overall positive because it would be a potential sign for nintendo's home consoles to turn around.

Besides the Wii miraculously bringing in 100 million units(fyi the chart is outdated, but it still works), Nintendo's home consoles are decreasing in sales.

 

NES: 62 million

SNES: 49 million

N64: 32 million

Gamecube: 21 million

Wii: 100 million

Wii U: 13 million

NX: ?

 



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

Around the Network

For the WiiU, 30m would have been more than acceptable, considering the high attach ratio of Nintendo games, and the 3DS being able to hold rather well despite mobile.



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

30 million I think is the line for Nintendo home consoles to reach. The N64 did alright.



Above gamecube numbers imo



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

You would have to ask Nintendo that question. I don't care about how well it sold, only it's game library which didn't live up to any previous Nintendo home console. That's why I consider the console a failure.



Around the Network

Anything above GameCube would've been good enough in my books, but 30M was probably the minimum needed for the Wii U to be considered a success.



"Just for comparison Uncharted 4 was 20x bigger than Splatoon 2. This shows the huge difference between Sony's first-party games and Nintendo's first-party games."

Around 30M would have been the borderline for Wii U imo.



They would be going from the Wii, anything below 50 Million would look bad..that's half your sales gone

Now going from Wii U, NX won't need as much to be considered successful



[] [] [] {} [] 

Rain2 said:
They would be going from the Wii, anything below 50 Million would look bad..that's half your sales gone

Now going from Wii U, NX won't need as much to be considered successful

Not necessarily. Remember Nintendo's devices have large attach rates. Also, the wii was cheap- the wii U is more expensive.

 

Not saying they won't lose a bunch of money, but it'll still be good enough for no damage to be caused.



 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12/22/2016- Made a bet with Ganoncrotch that the first 6 months of 2017 will be worse than 2016. A poll will be made to determine the winner. Loser has to take a picture of them imitating their profile picture.

I think anything over 30 Million would be a moderate success, providing that Nintendo actually makes money on the machine itself over a generation.

Can sell a lot of games on 30 Million units of hardware. Doesn't have to break records to be a success.