Lol. That is such a given thing. I read and said myself this would happen. Nintendo needs to recover costs and boost the NX line-up so this is very logical.

This does not necessarily mean no BC, since the ports could well be a definitive version of Smash and XCX for example, games that would benifit from the extra power and/or getting all DLC in one package.Though yeah, that makes NX having BC harder to believe.

If its true, I hope no one treats it as a negative towards Nintendo since every one and their mamas(third party,sony,microsoft) have been doing this exact same thing

It will be interesting to see what games the decide are ''worthy'' of a port

i cant see myself buying any of them

Probably the most expensive ones (Zelda U, Xenoblade X, Smash U) and the ones that won't really need a sequel (Mario Maker). Nintendo might want to bring both Bayo games too, it would only cost the porting, so it would be cheap.

Pokken, Splatoon and others will definitively get a sequel, so those won't get a port.

I think Splatoon will come early because it was such a big hit in Japan but had its legs cut off completely due to being on the Wii U and Wii U's stock/discontinuation.

They could add new areas and a few new modes I'm sure easily and bump the graphics up a notch to 1080P.

hint,hint,wink,wink..... *caugh*"zelda"*caugh*

Well she already basically said Zelda is for sure one of them. 

It's the other three, but we already had a reliable source say Smash Bros. 

I very doubt Nintendo would make Remaster of so many Wii U games if NX have BC, if this is true its almost certain that NX will not have BC.

Yeah Splatoon and Smash, have to be 2 of the other 3.

Had its legs cut off completely?Even with the stock issue, it still keeps selling 8k+,9k+ in Japan alone.Yeah it is certainly selling less because of that, but it still have legs.

The reason why I dont think Splatoon will have a port is because I think NX will have the sequel within the end of the first year, so putting the original on NX dosent make much sense