| Jumpin said: If the best your army can manage in a 1.5K run is 9:40 minutes, then no one in your army is fit for front line combat. |
What army?
Why can't women be on the front line? | |||
| They're physically not fit. | 62 | 32.29% | |
| They can do it if trained properly. | 102 | 53.13% | |
| That's not women's duty. | 12 | 6.25% | |
| I'm weak so I can't fat... | 16 | 8.33% | |
| Total: | 192 | ||
| Jumpin said: If the best your army can manage in a 1.5K run is 9:40 minutes, then no one in your army is fit for front line combat. |
What army?
Ka-pi96 said:
You can pretend it's not a war all you want, doesn't make it true... |
I don't have to friend, international law don't call internal conflicts or government vs paramilitary groups, war. It's all semantics meu amigo.
Don't hate the playa, hate the game.
I wonder how many of the guys responding to this, are just big fat asses who hang out in front of a monitor all day long?
Ka-pi96 said:
You can pretend it's not a war all you want, doesn't make it true... |
Goats just likes to be silly...
I don't why he's bothering to debate about it. War is war. It's not something that's defined by any international court or international law.
Just in case, you (goats) want to reply about it. Here's this bit for your viewing pleasure.
(wôr)
Idiom:

I love how a topic about women's situations are being discussed by predominantly male users.
| Kotastic said: I love how a topic about women's situations are being discussed by predominantly male users. |
It's about military service as well. I bet you love that most users here discussing it predominantly civilians.
Aeolus451 said:
Goats just likes to be silly... Just in case, you (goats) want to reply about it. Here's this bit for your viewing pleasure. |
Reading and comprehension is something I see you don't value much.
Anyway, have a good one Aeolus...451!
Goatseye said:
Reading and comprehension is something I see you don't value much. Anyway, have a good one Aeolus...451! |
Ah, there you go again.
I can read just fine. Your pic/gif is dead in your sig, btw

By a show of hands here, who actually has an armed forces service record?
Clearly we have some pretty strong opinions here, but I'm a lot more likely to push those opinions belonging to those who don't have any firsthand experience to the back of the line, if not gloss over them entirely.
The front half of my service was largely in integrated/coed units, from BCT to AIT, Airborne school, my first two assignments, etc. so I have a better grasp of what this entails on a practical, functional level than any armchair soldiers or pseudo academics.
I'm going to withhold my personal opinions here until I hear something relevant and intelligent.
We could probably start with the two sets of physical standards for men and women service members as far as the differences go to say nothing of the different mindsets or other differences between men and women.
In favor of the coed units, I would probably look first to the IDF. If we have any women or men who have served in the IDF, I would highly value their opinions and impressions in this discussion.
ArchangelMadzz said:
.. |
Not sure what exactly you're confused about here? Same reason merely being qualified doesn't land you a job offer. You have to be the appropriate candidate for the position and that isn't merely based upon competence. Competence only gets you to the table to interview, same principle here. Superior candidates should win out over inferior candidates and unfortunately in tests of strength and spatial intelligence the women just cannot compete.