Mr Puggsly said:
In 10 weeks we saw RotTR go from modest start to very respectable finish. In that same period we saw SFV have an amazing first week to abysmal legs. |
That is your opinion, and based on VGC and on a cut of time. It could very well end up on the vibe of SF growing and RTR diminishing. And what finish are you talking about? Is the game going to be removed from the market?
Mr Puggsly said:
When SE releases the figures for shipped, digital, and multple platforms perhaps we can compare that as well. |
Considering Marketshare and trend curves RTR's VGC numbers are a lot more precise than their number on SF V. And it's quite pointless to look at a number that is completely outside of the reasonable for one item and use it just because the other haven't had official PR from their company (but we had the bad numbers comment and them Ok comment from them, and MS comment on all going over 1M, that if it was a lot more than 1M they certainly would make more clear and you know it).
But if you preffer to keep pretending the VGC numbers are somewhat right just because they give you the conclusion you want, ok. Whenever more precise numbers arrise this thread may revive.
Or it will be just forgotten by you like a lot have forgotten about most Halo threads saying the sales were very good and the over 50% digital and it is left behind because it became unsustainable.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."