Chazore said:
Azuren said:
I do currently own an OG Xbox, and I've owned five XB360's. Competition breeds innovation, and what I was stating earlier was simply evidence to support that. Without real competition, Sony would stagnate.
Sony might not have gone for a lower development cost if they hadn't learned their lesson from MS. And I'm aware that PS3 beat XB360, it was also really close, though. They learn from each other, and as a result make each other better.
|
You still sound like you've always had it for Sony than MS though, like you want them around to make your fave brand better instead of going for the other rband even despite you owning past systems (which aren't current systems at that).
|
Well, I do prefer Sony systems, and I do want Xbox around to push PlayStation so my favorite brand can be better. I may eventually buy an XB1 for cheap, too, but the way things are going, it might not be worth it.
KungKras said:
Azuren said: I dunno, it might be too late to be saying things like this. E3 will give us a better understanding of what they plan on doing, though. I would prefer PlayStation keep its rival. |
A Nintendo/Sony rivalry would be so much better.
|
I disagree. I feel a Nintendo/Sony cohesion wouldwork better. Sony can handle home consoles, and Nintendo can handle handhelds.
KungKras said:
Azuren said:
Because of XB360, Sony was forced to more competitively price their console and learned that they can't charge whatever they want for home consoles. XB360 also introduced cross-game chat, which Sony now implements. Xbox's online infrastructure also directly inspired the PSN so that the PlayStation brand could compete in the online field. Without Xbox, we'd either be stuck paying out the nose for next-gen consoles, playing on PC, or playing Nintendo.
|
Those two last alternatives sounds awesome.
|
I couldn't disagree more, but different strokes for different folks.