By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - A question concerning economics & minimum wage

 

Should the minimum wage be increased to $15?

Yes, for all jobs. 47 37.60%
 
Yes, but only for certain jobs. 11 8.80%
 
No, only for more professional jobs. 10 8.00%
 
No, not at all. 44 35.20%
 
Other/ N/A 13 10.40%
 
Total:125
Teeqoz said:
sabvre42 said:

Thats a REDICULOUSLY flawed argument. Minimum wage causes cost of living inflation. If you double their income, they will NOT see double the spending power. The working poor (above minimum wage) and the middle class will actually see their spending power go down, and therefore there will be LESS products sold, and less demand.

Also note that those working at minimum wage now make up more than enough money in government assistance that their spending power will remain the same or go down.

Prices won't increase proportionately to minimum wage increase, not even close. Consumer goods are priced for the middle class, not for the lowest earners, so while prices might increase somewhat, their purchasing power would still be substantially higher. And isn't part of the point that it shouldn't really be possible to have a job yet still need food stamps (or whatever else governmental assistance you mean)?

No. Government assistance is better for the economy than forcing the market to use a minimum wage.

Also, a $15 an hour minimum wage would cause a 20-40% cost of living spike depending on your region. The poor would not see their purchasing power go up AT ALL. Minimum wage workers are already compensated by the government. The middle class on the other hand would have their purchasing power go down as employers are not going to adjust the market up 20-40%.



Around the Network
hershel_layton said:

Bernie Sanders has a goal of making a $15 minimum wage, ranging from librarians to your McDonalds cashiers. I've been thinking about it a lot lately, but wouldn't that cause more harm than good?

I'm not exactly the smartest in economics, so please bare with me. If we drastically increase the minimum wage, wouldn't that result into inflation, thus making the wage increase redundant and useless? 

Again, I'm not the most educated on American economics. I'm still learning about it, so don't be surprised if I have misunderstood this subject.

Inflation is a complex issue, but to keep it as simple as possible, it is determined by how much money is in the system.  Raising the minimum wage does not put any more money into the system, it simply changes who has the money.  Instead of McDonald's corporate having it, McDonald's workers have it.

It wouldn't, or shouldn't result in national inflation, but it may lead to companies dependent on minimum wage labor raising their prices.  But, on the flip side, more money in the hands of workers could be beneficial as they spend more money on things.



JWeinCom said:
hershel_layton said:

Bernie Sanders has a goal of making a $15 minimum wage, ranging from librarians to your McDonalds cashiers. I've been thinking about it a lot lately, but wouldn't that cause more harm than good?

I'm not exactly the smartest in economics, so please bare with me. If we drastically increase the minimum wage, wouldn't that result into inflation, thus making the wage increase redundant and useless? 

Again, I'm not the most educated on American economics. I'm still learning about it, so don't be surprised if I have misunderstood this subject.

Inflation is a complex issue, but to keep it as simple as possible, it is determined by how much money is in the system.  Raising the minimum wage does not put any more money into the system, it simply changes who has the money.  Instead of McDonald's corporate having it, McDonald's workers have it.

It wouldn't, or shouldn't result in national inflation, but it may lead to companies dependent on minimum wage labor raising their prices.  But, on the flip side, more money in the hands of workers could be beneficial as they spend more money on things.

It will not raise or lower the value of our dollar vs the rest of the world. It will however, lower the purchasing power of the dollar within the United States itself.



Cobretti2 said:
Since someone mentioned milk lol

https://www.woolworths.com.au/Shop/Search/Products?searchTerm=milk

Those prices seem reasonable the only reason milk is pretty cheap in the US is because there are a lot of government subsidies for milk famers.  The only way milk prices are gonna spike in the US if they get rid of all the subsidies for it.



sabvre42 said:
Teeqoz said:

Prices won't increase proportionately to minimum wage increase, not even close. Consumer goods are priced for the middle class, not for the lowest earners, so while prices might increase somewhat, their purchasing power would still be substantially higher. And isn't part of the point that it shouldn't really be possible to have a job yet still need food stamps (or whatever else governmental assistance you mean)?

No. Government assistance is better for the economy than forcing the market to use a minimum wage.

Also, a $15 an hour minimum wage would cause a 20-40% cost of living spike depending on your region. The poor would not see their purchasing power go up AT ALL. Minimum wage workers are already compensated by the government. The middle class on the other hand would have their purchasing power go down as employers are not going to adjust the market up 20-40%.

Cost of living for low-income workers might be up 20%, but cost for middle class? Lmao, no. Iphones, Xboxes/Playstations, electricity, house rent, real estate prices (in middle class areas), gasoline and a ton of other things will barely budge by a minimum wage increase. Cost of living for middle class will be marginally higher, not even close to 20%, not to mention 40%.



Around the Network
Teeqoz said:
sabvre42 said:

No. Government assistance is better for the economy than forcing the market to use a minimum wage.

Also, a $15 an hour minimum wage would cause a 20-40% cost of living spike depending on your region. The poor would not see their purchasing power go up AT ALL. Minimum wage workers are already compensated by the government. The middle class on the other hand would have their purchasing power go down as employers are not going to adjust the market up 20-40%.

Cost of living for low-income workers might be up 20-40%, but cost for middle class? Lmao, no. Iphones, Xboxes/Playstations, electricity, house rent, real estate prices (in middle class areas), gasoline and a ton of other things will barely budge by a minimum wage increase. Cost of living for middle class will be marginally higher, not even close to 20%, not to mention 40%.

Do you understand or know what "cost of living" actually is?

Cost of living is not measured as a % of someone's wages but a set amount. That set amount will increase by 20-40% across the board for all classes. Yes, this will have a lower impact on the middle class than the poor as they have more discretionary income... but its still a loss of discretionary spending.

Also, electricity, consoles, phones, and all sorts of consumer goods WILL see a rise in cost. Customer services centers, distribution centers,  retail centers all employee people below $15 an hour. Amazon for example runs on razor thin retailer margins, and employees minimum wage workers in their distribution centers. Do you really think they can afford to just eat the payroll costs without offsetting it with a margin increase?



sabvre42 said:
Teeqoz said:

Cost of living for low-income workers might be up 20-40%, but cost for middle class? Lmao, no. Iphones, Xboxes/Playstations, electricity, house rent, real estate prices (in middle class areas), gasoline and a ton of other things will barely budge by a minimum wage increase. Cost of living for middle class will be marginally higher, not even close to 20%, not to mention 40%.

Do you understand or know what "cost of living" actually is?

Cost of living is not measured as a % of someone's wages but a set amount. That set amount will increase by 20-40% across the board for all classes. Yes, this will have a lower impact on the middle class than the poor as they have more discretionary income... but its still a loss of discretionary spending.

Also, electricity, consoles, phones, and all sorts of consumer goods WILL see a rise in cost. Customer services centers, distribution centers,  retail centers all employee people below $15 an hour.

That is true, but it doesn't really matter for the point I was making. Impact on middle class will be marginal.

The small impact it will have on middle class disposable income will be negated by the benefits of the low-income workers getting paid more. If income for low-income workers increase by more than the cost of living increases, and the increase in cost of living has a miniscule impact on middle class, overall household spending would increase, positively affecting the economy, and in addition federal expenditure for government expenditure for governmentsl assistance would decrease, what's not to like really?



cdude1034 said:
Groundking said:

No, a minimum wage just causes unemployment for the worse of in society, how is somebody with no skills or experience (particularly in America, the black youths) who's labor is worth (for example) $4.00 an hour or less, supposed to get work when the enforced minimum hourly rate is $7.50, and we have a prat who wants to raise this even higher? Does he not want youth to work at all?

Also for people bitching about the income inequality, well try living in your means, saving 5-10% of your post tax yearly income, and invest this money in assets that either grow your income or grow your wealth (or both). It's no coincidence that since the 80's, when family savings dropped from an average of ~5% (it depends which state and which country, but this is a fairly accurate average for the western developed countries) to and average of effectively 0%, income inequality has boomed. 

Spoken like somebody who's never known what it's like to be poor. "Just save 5-10%". Assume someone makes $8/hr. Working full time that's roughly $17k per year. Take away 10% for taxes and you're left with $15,300/year.

Now let's say rent in Anytown, USA is $600/month. Good luck getting any place that isn't infested with cockroaches for $600/mo. That's $7,200/yr. You now have $8,100 left.

Now factor in food, utilities, bus pass/car maintainance, laundromat visits, incidentals, doctor bills, AND a health insurance penalty because minimum wage workers far and wide do not receive benefits like healthcare in the US, and I submit to you that you would not have "5-10%" left to save. Not only that, but you can bet with a reasonable degree of accuracy that if you're making minimum wage, you've attained a minimum level of education. You probably grew up poor in a poor neighborhood with lots of crime and went to a poor school with not-so-great teachers and are around other poor people who have no idea what investing even is much less how to do it. Poor people in this country (US) are not afforded the same opportunities through education as their middle and upper class peers.

I've made roughly one post a year on this site for the last 5 or so years. It usually takes something so incredibly ignorant like this to make me actually want to post, but you did it. Good job.

Oh beleive me I know what it's like to have been poor, living in shithole flats with needles all over the play, junkies passed out in the corridors, coppers round regularily, and I wasn't directing my post at only the poor, as income inequality has increased for all the bottom 60%, and is flat for the next 20%, with the top 20 getting everything. So i'm not talking about just the poor, but whilst we're talking about the poor, ok so there's somebody who's working full time minimum wage, let's assume they get 8 hours sleep, 8 hours work, 2 hours getting ready+travel+eating, that still leaves them with 6 hours in the week to educate themselves, work a shift in a bar, find some online work, look for a better job etc. Then at the weekend they have 16 hours, they could use this time to get another job, even if it's only a 10 hour minimum wage bar work job at the weekend, that's instantly another $72.50 a week. That's $3,700, and better yet, if it's informal/bar work, likely you're going to be getting cash in hand, so don't declare your income FFS, then you can pocket the whole packet, and even if you do declare it, it's still just shy of $3,400 (it's actually a touch less than that due to the way tax brackets work in the US, personally I think it's shit that the US doesn't have a 0% tax band like the UK does, where you're first £10,600 of income is tax free). And with this second job you're, at the very leastm getting more experience and stuff to put on your CV, or you're gaining new skills, all of which help in getting better employment. The thought that education ends when you leave school needs to die, you should never stop trying to learn new things. Hell it's easier than ever with the Internet.

And again, do you want even more unemployed people? 



sabvre42 said:
Sharpryno said:

 

It's really not.  If minimum wage went up to $9 an hour.  You think the cost of everything will increase by $1.75?  Not even close, maybe 10 cents.  

If you work 40 hours a week, no matter the job, you should be able to afford a decent living.  Not dirt poor poverty like we have today.  And companies cutting hours to under 30 so employees receive zero benefits simply needs to end.  

Too much greed in the world today. 

$9 <> $15 does it buddy?

$9 an hour is barely above where the market has placed most peoples wages. The number of people that actually make federal minimum wage is alot less than you seem to think. The amount than make less than $15 an hour is much much much higher.

Yes, IIRC, Sanders plan is as followed:

2017: $9.25/hour
2018: $10.75/hour
2019: $12.50/hour
2020: $15.00/hour

Or something similiar.  My only complaint is rural areas that  can be problematic.  But most places, perfectly acceptable.  Corporations and republicans have literally brain washed people into think minimum wage is fine where it is.  And that is a massive joke.  I make north of 70 grand a year about 6 months after college and I am in massive favor of it rising.  Too many people I know back home where I am from have to live with those shitty jobs and make slave wages. 

If you somehow get away from these slave wage jobs, government assistance would be much less in regards to welfare.  Think big businesses give a shit if you have to live off the government as well as work in order to live life, negative.  

America is falling behind other countries because of corporate greed with examples being this, healthcare, college tuition and so much more.  



Sharpryno said:
sabvre42 said:

$9 <> $15 does it buddy?

$9 an hour is barely above where the market has placed most peoples wages. The number of people that actually make federal minimum wage is alot less than you seem to think. The amount than make less than $15 an hour is much much much higher.

Yes, IIRC, Sanders plan is as followed:

2017: $9.25/hour
2018: $10.75/hour
2019: $12.50/hour
2020: $15.00/hour

Or something similiar.  My only complaint is rural areas that  can be problematic.  But most places, perfectly acceptable.  Corporations and republicans have literally brain washed people into think minimum wage is fine where it is.  And that is a massive joke.  I make north of 70 grand a year about 6 months after college and I am in massive favor of it rising.  Too many people I know back home where I am from have to live with those shitty jobs and make slave wages. 

If you somehow get away from these slave wage jobs, government assistance would be much less in regards to welfare.  Think big businesses give a shit if you have to live off the government as well as work in order to live life, negative.  

America is falling behind other countries because of corporate greed with examples being this, healthcare, college tuition and so much more.  

Actually the standard of living for the poorest 10% of America is a fair bit higher than most European countries, with only Sweden (massive gas producer) Canada, Australia and another country that I can't remember, with any significantly higher standard of living for the bottom 10%.