Would be fun to see what kinda train wreck he could make of things :)
He would shake things up abit. I dont mind either way.

I support Trump.

Political Correctness is currently destroying Europe and that is going to come overseas very soon. Out of fear of being "racist" Europe has refused to acknowledge an existential crisis that is so severe that their entire way of life is now threatened. It is one thing to want to help legitimate and peaceful refugees, but it is quite another to deny the existence of hoards of healthy, single, military-aged Muslim males who openly profess that they want to destroy your society.

The Liberal ideology is broken because it can no longer differentiate between "racism" and a person's legitimate fear for national security. As a result the left is going to become more and more authoritarian towards conservatives to compensate for the increasing dysfunctionality of their beliefs. Rapes will not be reported by the media, terrorist attacks will downplayed, and any right-wing opposition to radical Islam will be harshly suppressed. It's not racist to want to stop these things. I want Trump to be in power because he is the candidate who is the least controlled by that stupid liberal ideology who's concept of racism is still stuck in 1960's where anything "non-white" is inherently good. In some cultures, there are a significant number of people who want to destroy us and we need a leader who can at least acknowledge this fact.

Remember of course that nobody, Muslim or not, has a right to enter the US.  So discrimination is not even a word to be used when temporarily banning a flood of people until we have a way to be certain of who they are and thier intentions. This seems like a no-brainer to people who actually think about what is at stake.  When Obama says 'widows and orphans', you know that he has no idea of what he is doing.  If you have a problem with spiders comming into your house, and some[or even just a couple] of them are black widows, you need to make sure that NO spiders can enter unless you can be sure only the good ones are getting in. This is actually the most important job of the POTUS. And anyone who says ' the King of Saudi Arabia is muslim and would be banned' is a fool talking a fools game. Trump and Rubio '16!

Wow, nearly everything you said is completely incorrect. Please don't vote.

NO. Next question.

My number one candidate is Rand Paul as well. But the OP has seriously misunderstood and oversimplified every candidate. Do not go to this guy for political advice! (Or any Trump supporter for that matter)

They all suck, lol.

Is it that hard for us all to realize the candidates are a joke? I thought this was originally intended to be a circus

Trump is to infantile as Clinton is to pandering. On the one hand, you have a man who is impetuous and acts without contemplation. On the other hand, you have a woman who will steal her opponent's policies to take advantage of snapshot polls. It seems unwise to elect a president (Trump) who uses twitter like Amber Rose, except he will flippantly retweet a neo-Nazi, white supremacist, just to make fun of an opponent he is crushing (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-tweet-idUSMTZSAPEC1MDCX42B). Clinton effectively does this same (with less bombast) and will seemingly do whatever will get her elected. Businesses already run the government by proxy (the congress), so I don't see the allure of electing a businessman as president or someone who they are running by proxy to complete the circle.

With regards to the OP, it is a hyper simplification of the situation. Additionally, the world really dislikes Trump, disproportionately so, and that doesn't seem like a step in the right direction:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=212081&page=1#

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=212609&page=6#3

I say yes so our descendants can see that glorious hair in all future school history books.

I hope he wins so badly.

No, no, no, no, no!!!