Trump is to infantile as Clinton is to pandering. On the one hand, you have a man who is impetuous and acts without contemplation. On the other hand, you have a woman who will steal her opponent's policies to take advantage of snapshot polls. It seems unwise to elect a president (Trump) who uses twitter like Amber Rose, except he will flippantly retweet a neo-Nazi, white supremacist, just to make fun of an opponent he is crushing (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-tweet-idUSMTZSAPEC1MDCX42B). Clinton effectively does this same (with less bombast) and will seemingly do whatever will get her elected. Businesses already run the government by proxy (the congress), so I don't see the allure of electing a businessman as president or someone who they are running by proxy to complete the circle.
With regards to the OP, it is a hyper simplification of the situation. Additionally, the world really dislikes Trump, disproportionately so, and that doesn't seem like a step in the right direction:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=212081&page=1#
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=212609&page=6#3
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
