Yeah, ok, but why are the problems with crimes against women so damn important (I mean it's all over the place, it's in the news and even a topic in politics all the time) when there are actually happening more crimes against men?

Now we're talking business. You would want to change the society into what and how? I'm really curious. If it's feminist context we're talking about, I'd like to know if you advocate the society the feminists advocate and what do you think it's like?

As far as the feminist rhetoric goes, when speaking of rapes, if you get raped by an immigrant, it is because the society made him to do so, and the feminists do not condemn the rapist. If a native western male commits rape, it is because the white male oppress women and it's the fault of the rapist.

As we're still talking about feminism and society, it's interesting how it is self-induced and therefore ok, if you get shot for having a picture or two of a  prophet in your magazine, and the shooters are the actual victims, but, let's say, you get drunk, don't know who you had sex with, or if you did at all, but if you did, you might have been raped by someone, is a reason for shitstorm when the police don't take you seriously, and you condemn the society and the police and the white male and everyone involved.

@SpokenTruth: I mean, as I already said, the polical feminism advocates either communism or anarchy, or both.

The feministic attacks aren't that much about equality as it is about attack on the society. And this is what people can read inbetween the lines and get annoyed about. The examples I used were from real life today. It doesn't matter if it is fair or not, as long as it shakes the current capitalistic society in one way or the other. Whether it's 9/11, the Paris attacks or any other, it is always the victim that deserve to be attacked.

Ok, how often men get beaten up in taxi line, and how often do women. Yes, you are right that just because both sexes can be victims of violence, doesn't mean you should ignore the other. But the thing is, that in feminist narrative, the basis for verdict isn't the victim, but the one that assaulted you; if you're considered as victim by otherness, you're not getting penalised that easilly.

edit:

i deleted everything i wrote here. even though it was really funny, i saw some mod guy make a comment about how they will ban anybody who crosses the line. i dont believe i even came close to that line, but im not taking any chances here. really trying to put my best foot forward even though it is hard at times.

disregard this post. im sorry i even created it.

Isn't there? I thought the Green movement describes itself as feministic, is pretty open with their new world order plans and is full of anarchists. Not only that, but they silently accept any act of terrorism or so in the west, but condemn every attempt to return peace in the developing world.

The vocal ones make the headlines more easilly, but so do the sane ones when theyre active in politics and are in parliamets - the message is still the same though.

Yes, but I'd say it is more about labelling -> simplifying than it is about making ourselves feel better - on an individual basis that is. Sure, much of the media loves to add shock value and sensationalism to their broadcasts - because a peaceful feminist rally won't garner as much attention of course.

What you say rings true. I'd argue that easily more than 50% of the social problems we face today can be solved by receiving objective education on the topic - and looking at both sides of the story of course. It's hard to avoid conforming to a convenient "truth" when so many people already have - especially when you aren't educated on the matter at hand. I'm lucky in that I study social sciences at University so I get to talk about this a lot. Generalisations do not make it very close to fruition in lecture halls, let me tell you lol.

For everyone else: Feminism is the advocacy of social equality for men in women, in opposition to patriarchy and sexism. The basic principles of feminism are:

-importance of change

-expanding human choice

-eliminating gender stratification

-ending sexual violence

-promoting sexual autonomy

Anyone who tells you otherwise; well I can smell the bullshit wafting from their mouth all the way over here. Every political or social movement with have militant or extremist members. They do not make the whole group. They should not be considered part of the same group.

I hope one day you'll be able to look back on this and realize how fucking stupid you were. You realize that you are saying it is the woman's fault that she was raped, correct? I'm pretty sure that is what you're saying, but I figure I'll give you a chance to save face.

Moderated

Answers in bold

"Gender rights activist" here. Which gender? Do I really have to pick one?

I don't think that he was saying that but I believe his point is that a person's choices have the largest influence on how something might play out or the likelihood that it will go one versus the other. That's true of anything really. 

If someone is gonna get wasted, they should do that around multiple trusted people (close friends/family) to ensure nothing bad will take place. Sure, no one can or should blame a victim for something bad happening to 'em but the event probably wouldn't of happened if the person was more cautious.