I checked out the review- how would you consider it 'good'? fairly speaking it did not discuss that many gameplay elements or differences between the previous installments. she just keeps blah blah blah-ing about how she is happy that there is a female character that isn't overly sexualized and how she is UNHAPPY that the female character is not the dominant character in the game. yawn./

Abbath, its great that you're finding content to provoke discussion on the forums.

Could you please begin to provide some commentary of your own though?

It might just be a quick summary of the video in the OP (even just a few dot points), or a summation of the outcomes of a review/preview. Or it could be a more fleshed out view of your own opinions.

Thanks.

Well, there were pieces I thought were good, such as the repetitive objectives and well designed characters as well as pointing out minor bugs in the game... I'm sure there was a bit more good in there... : P maybe I'm being lenient

.

She talked about glitches for a few seconds, but otherwise not really.  She complained about how there weren't enough people of color in Victorian London and also about how the female main character isn't represented as much as the male main character.  Probably 90% of the video was about women representation.

Oh for the love of god, when will this chick just fall off the face of the earth? Her "Men bad, women good" shtick has gotten stale already.

Anyone care to post a transcript? I have no desire to give this person any views (how many are there btw?).

She didn't review the game, really. Nothing about game or story. She mainly talked about the lead female character and how little she was in the game compared to the male protagonist. 

Interesting review... but I've little interest in yet another assassins creed game.

You're assuming that she actually bothers to play most of the games she talks about.