Knack is AAA look at the graphics best physics effects ever made, most nintendo games arent AAA thats why they are also priced at 40€. So i dont understand why you argue about the AAA quality of sonys japanese exclusives here as a nintendo fan? 

High budget doesnt equal AAA or vic versa and you have no info about any budget of sonys exclusives. 

In terms of consoles sales, Uncharted 5 could be PS4 only exclusive game (not counting console exclusivity like SFV) for the entire generation and the PS4 would still have the most sales if all future third party console game keep releasing for it. PS4 is just too attractive for the mainstream audience to be in 2nd place now.

On topic: I don't think most gamers really care about exclusive if all the major third party games keep coming for the PS4 and are the best versions as well. First party is great but when you already have a lot of good games for your system, its just icing on top. Forum goers like us probably care more though but we are a tiny few.

In what capacity is TLOU RE avaliable on the PS3? 

So you agree on Infamous and Bloodbourne being AAA, but you seem to have forgotten the original question.

You said new games are more important than remasters.

I asked how? When I compared Knack to TLOU RE you made a whole bunch of excuses, so now I'm comparing it to Infamous and Bloodbourne, both of which have sold less and had lower metacritic scores, so again in what sense are these games more important than TLOU RE?

Nah, just keep on chugging with the indie games.

I think you are reading more in my words than what is there.

I mean Media molecule doesnt make Big games of the AAA sort. They make creative and sweet games, but not the big production type. Tearaway unfolded was developed by 4 people for the longest time (most of their people working on something else i assume. Perhaps the new PS4 titles). That is pretty much an indie team, wich is why i said that. Actually i just checked... its a 47 people studio. They are a small studio.

When i say Sony Japan is all over the place, i mean they do small and big titles with lots of partnerships, so its difficult to place their capabilities.

And here we have an example of someone who lost the capability to think for himself and uses metacritic as if it was some sort of fact.

Why only use TLOU: R btw? Why don't you use the countless other remasters on the PS4. Oh, they didn't sell as much? Ok. ;)

Oh and TLOU: R is heavily bundled.

But hey, if you think remasters are more important, be my guest. Have fun playing nothing but PS3 remasters on your PS4 then, I better don't see you playing any new games on your PS4.

I guess Flower on the PS4 is also better than Infamous, Driveclub and Bloodborne?

Metacritic is just the average of reviewer scores other than sales its the only objective metric with regards to game.

However, I never stated what I think about TLOU RE, Bloodborne, Knack, etc... I just stated the facts, it has nothing to do with I think. Although, I do think you should stop trying to deflect the question.

And Yes I do use TLOU RE because of how well it did, but you never said remasters in general, you said remasters in absolute, so ANY remaster is valid.

TLOU: RE bundles aren't counted in sales bruh.

Again, this has nothing to do with what I think, I'm just asking questions. Why is it so hard to answer the question?

What does better mean to you? I simply compared sales and metacritic ratings. Does that constitute importance? I wouldn't know you never really defined importance. Flower might very well be more important than Infamous or Bloodborne, but that depends on your metric.

OK then. At least I know what you meant now.

Looks like they did their job. Just look at the PS4 2016 exclusive lineup... HOLY COW!