Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
I'm not saying anything. I'm just asking questions, which you still haven't attempted to answer.
Why is Knack not a AAA game, it had a AAA budget and was produced by SCE Japan Studio which is a AAA developer?
It didn't have an AAA budget and SCE Japan Studio is not an AAA developer (there, I said it). Their Western studios get to work with much higher budgets and they're the only AAA studios they have. I even remember an interview where the TLG developers said as much.
TLOU RE is still a remaster, is it a AAA exclusive game or not?
No, the game is also on PS3.
What about Infamous: Second Son, it sold 2.32 million with a metacritic of (80)/7.9? It wasn't a launch game, it released only 4 months before TLOU RE and it has an established fan base of 5.22 million on PS3 with its previous incarnations. TLOU on PS3 sold 5.6 million so they are quite close.
Infamous is AAA yes.
What about Bloodborne, It has a metacritic of (92)/8.6, still lower than TLOU RE's (95)/8.9?
Bloodborne is also AAA, at least I think so, it looks like it has high production values. Not sure what metacritic has to do with this debate? I don't rely on them to tell me how good a game is.
Also "Good stuff" is a meaningless distinction, "good" is subjective, that's why I said stuff, and you're talking about first party games here, I just said stuff. But If you want me to answer your questions, it is common courtesy to answer the ones I've already given to you. FYI, the ones above are just restatements of the original question.
This thread is about AAA exclusives, so talking about third party games makes no sense unless it's being published by Sony.
|
