That is a bad list. That's a really bad list.

It revolutionized the market.

Clickbait for what? Not only is it a book, have you seen their website recently? It's a blog on GamesRadar. Future Publishing hasn't got time to make decent website and keep them running anymore. (Ingoring the fact with effort they could turn Edge into a great brand).

Super Mario Bros. was way more important, and it's not even in the list.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion... even if it's wrong... so so wrong.

Really?Pokemon is just to appeal to fanbase?I dont know about the more recent releases(X and Y, Omega Ruby and so on), but the first ones are timeless, in the sense they are still great even today.If you say things like these is probably because you never really played a pokemon game, or not played the best ones.Red and blue should easily be in the top 20, maybe even in the top 10.

Now as for about your second claim, its also wrong.Of course those old games wont hold up to today because they are more than 30, 40 years old.But only by the fact that they created a genre by themselves should prove that they are indeed, excellent games,and should be recognized so.

Peculiar list tbh especially going by the criteria they set for the list.

So did Angry Birds

Angry Bird did nothing with the video gaming market.

It pretty much single handedly started the mobile gaming boom.