OK, so speculative-Vita talk should be looked down, because Vita is a dead sex machine and PS4 will become a better console because of it.

I'll keep on playing games on my Vita and stay interested about the future.

Sony can not support the Vita, because the Vita has multiple input methods. Vita is a highly capable mobile device that offers more than a simple multitouch screen. Therefore Vita is more limited than Smartphones, and it can never be more than just a gaming toy. It is for this reason that Sony has turned its back on Vita, and puts its focus on the extremely limited Xperia line of products. Due to the Xperias limited input methods, it is a much more versatile device. Thanks to the limitations of the Xperia lines multitouch only input method, this means Xperia products can perform a much wider variety of tasks, and that is what consumers are looking for.

If can you see that the paragraph above is some of the illogical and ignorant BS ever spewed, then you should be able to see the misfortune of the Vita. Vita is a device that wipes the floor with all of these other multitouch devices. Thanks to its additional inputs, the Vita far exceeds everything else in the mobile space, with only the 3DS running with it. Unfourtunatly for both devices, gamers have deeed that Portables can never be anything more than what I stated above. If any company trys to go beyond that, and capture a larger marketshare to try and build a userbase that developers will be comfortable with, these gamers are willing to excommunicate them. These people refuse to make a phone call, browse the web, look at facebook, use an e-reader, follow a diet / helth program, or pay their bills on a game device, because that is not what it was made for.

So where do these peope go instead. Not to another game platform, nope, if portables are going to do all of that stuff then forget them, they give up gaming all together. Why? Because phones where made for paying bills, looking at the web, checking facebook, reading e content, paying bills, and following health plans.

That is why Sony no longer invests in the Vita. They don't know how tk make it acceptable for a game device to be used in the same manner as a smartphone or PC. Micosoft can't figure it out as Xbox One has showed, and to this point Nintendo really hasn't tried. This is why Vita fan not make a comeback either. Unless Sony can solve the mystery of why a games first platform can not do more, the future of moblie games is dead. Even more sad, is the same thing is coming for consoles. That is why both MS and Sony are fighting to try and convince people to use their consoles for more. If they can't, then gaming at home will have the same fate as mobile gaming.

Vita has Sony support around first 2 years but Vita was still sell bad, than Sony simply pull out whole support.

I don't see why it would be a problem.  Sony Santa Monica didn't develop the GoW games for PSP - it was outsourced.  Exact same thing could happen here.

Same with GT.  I mean, it would be even less of a job - all you'd need is a studio to port the assets over from GT5/6 and get it running decently on the console.  Polyphony need not lift a finger beyond giving them the original code.

Would probably be fine for GoW, but Kaz doesn't strike me as the kind of person to be hands off on even a port.  GoW really isn't as big a deal as GT either.  Not even remotely close, really

I just wish that Sony who seems to just wanna be done with the Vita would quite releasing more and more patches/updates try farther block hacking/homebrew! The Vita when fully hacked is gonna make one heck of an emulator machine just like the PSP!

You're probably right, but maybe it's time to clamp down and start acting like the boss with some of these creators :P

Focus on PS4 and PS Now, the best thing for them to do with the Vita is remove its exclusive library entirely and lateralize it with the PS4 and PS Now, essentially making it a PS4 mini.

They could turn it it into PS4's version of a gamepad except it would be standalone. That way they could guarantee support with minimal expense

Personally, I'm fine with giving PD complete and utter autonomy (though, probably take lessons from Evolution for network compatibility).  

Really?  Up to 2005 I'd agree with you wholeheartedly, but their decision making since then has seemed pretty terrible.

They have competition from Turn 10 now, who make games quicker, better and on more relevant platforms too.