Kotaku are clearly out for hits.
The article from a few days ago only had a dozen or so comments. Their latest propaganda piece has already racked up 40 comments.
Autor right about now...


Kotaku are clearly out for hits.
The article from a few days ago only had a dozen or so comments. Their latest propaganda piece has already racked up 40 comments.
Autor right about now...


| Chromeo said: He's actually played the game, which is more than the vast majority of us can claim. I'd say his preview holds weight. |
Only he didn't.
Goatseye said:
Only he didn't. |
How do you know that?
PSN ID- RayCrocheron82
XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82
NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237
YouTube- Rafie Crocheron
| Rafie said: How do you know that? |
"For two years, we’ve wondered what Quantum Break actually is. Having seen it, I’m now worried that Quantum Break is a bland-looking shooter"
"The presenter running the demo showed off a gunfight against some hired goons"
Jimbo1337 said:
"The presenter running the demo showed off a gunfight against some hired goons" |
Color me corrected. Btw, I wasn't being funny when I asked. I thought the guy wrote it because he played it.
PSN ID- RayCrocheron82
XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82
NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237
YouTube- Rafie Crocheron
Could it be that Kotaku are more interested in getting clicks than writing a proper article? :)
|
Rafie said: Color me corrected. Btw, I wasn't being funny when I asked. I thought the guy wrote it because he played it.
|
@bold - Which is why I am not taking his review that seriously. On top of that, he was watching someone else play a demo and not the full game.
I actually thought this game looked excellent and provided a great story with interesting gameplay. My only concern are the time powers that were displayed in the Gamescom Conference demo. To me, it seemed like those powers provided an 'easy mode' for defeating those enemies. Hopefully there will be restrictions/consquences when using these power-ups. Otherwise, players will simply walk through this game from start to finish.
| Puppyroach said: Could it be that Kotaku are more interested in getting clicks than writing a proper article? :) |
I feel like Game Informer is in the same boat sometimes.
PSN ID- RayCrocheron82
XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82
NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237
YouTube- Rafie Crocheron
Jimbo1337 said:
@bold - Which is why I am not taking his review that seriously. On top of that, he was watching someone else play a demo and not the full game. I actually thought this game looked excellent and provided a great story with interesting gameplay. My only concern are the time powers that were displayed in the Gamescom Conference demo. To me, it seemed like those powers provided an 'easy mode' for defeating those enemies. Hopefully there will be restrictions/consquences when using these power-ups. Otherwise, players will simply walk through this game from start to finish. |
Maybe these powers will have some drawbacks to using them. I'm sure Remedy won't let the game be that easy for us. I agree that I thought this game looked absolutely stunning. I also liked the way it played as well. I'm sure the framerate will increase as well. The gameplay one we saw had many drops. Then again, it's a pre-alpha build, right?!
PSN ID- RayCrocheron82
XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82
NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237
YouTube- Rafie Crocheron
Always the same reaction whenever a website writes something bad about a game.
Some of their concerns are justified. I too have had QB on my radar for a while and even liked the Gamescom footage. But the more details I know about the "live action", the more it's killing the game for me.
Let's just be thankful we still have websites that still speak out on exactly what they think and not ones that worry about their sponsors.
