RolStoppable said:
|
Who will win Super Bowl 50? | |||
Patriots | 116 | 25.00% | |
Seahawks | 41 | 8.84% | |
Colts | 7 | 1.51% | |
Packers | 42 | 9.05% | |
Broncos | 85 | 18.32% | |
Ravens | 8 | 1.72% | |
Cowboys | 18 | 3.88% | |
Panthers | 56 | 12.07% | |
Other | 74 | 15.95% | |
Scoreboard | 17 | 3.66% | |
Total: | 464 |
RolStoppable said:
|
LudicrousSpeed said: I think Denver got blown out last time they played in Detroit, though that was with Tim Tebow at QB IIRC. This game worries me as a trap game, especially if Stafford sits out. |
Detroit's D is meh this year, and their offense was beaten up badly by MUCH less severe defenses than Denver's this year. Denver's offense may have a number of question marks, but I don't think Detroit has a prayer here. They are going to need an ER for Stafford by the 2nd half.
RolStoppable said:
|
Man I'm doing shitty, teams that would be lock for win are killing me...
I'll pick the Giants to win tonight, even though they're going to do the opposite of everything I pick them to do. That's how little faith I have in Washington's roster.
WAS-NYG | 2 | ATL-DAL | 2 |
IND-TEN | 2 |
OAK-CLE | 2 |
CIN-BAL | 2 |
JAC-NE | 2 | NO-CAR | 2 | PHI-NYJ | 2 |
TB-HOU | 2 | SD-MIN | 1 | PIT-STL | 1 |
SF-ARI | 2 |
BUF-MIA | 1 | CHI-SEA | 2 | DEN-DET | 1 |
KC-GB | GB by 7 |
WAS-NYG | 2 | ATL-DAL | 2 | IND-TEN | 1 | OAK-CLE | 2 |
CIN-BAL | 1 | JAC-NE | 2 | NO-CAR | 2 | PHI-NYJ | 2 |
TB-HOU | 2 | SD-MIN | 2 | PIT-STL | 1 | SF-ARI | 2 |
BUF-MIA | 1 | CHI-SEA | 2 | DEN-DET | 1 | KC-GB | 2 by 13 |
WAS-NYG | 1 |
ATL-DAL | 2 |
IND-TEN | 1 | OAK-CLE | 2 |
CIN-BAL | 2 | JAC-NE | 2 | NO-CAR | 2 | PHI-NYJ | 2 |
TB-HOU | 2 | SD-MIN | 2 | PIT-STL | 1 | SF-ARI | 2 |
BUF-MIA | 1 | CHI-SEA | 2 | DEN-DET | 1 | KC-GB | 2 by 17 |
Picking the Giants for tonight
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers
WAS-NYG | 1 | ATL-DAL | 2 |
IND-TEN | 2 | OAK-CLE | 2 |
CIN-BAL | 2 | JAC-NE | 2 | NO-CAR | 2 | PHI-NYJ | 2 |
TB-HOU | 1 | SD-MIN | 2 | PIT-STL | 1 | SF-ARI | 2 |
BUF-MIA | 2 |
CHI-SEA | 2 | DEN-DET | 1 |
KC-GB | GB by 11 |
RolStoppable said: The Redskins have a run-first offense with two good running backs; the Giants defense isn't good against the run. |
In fairness, the Giants' pass defense is as bad, if not worse. They've given up about seven times more yards in the air than on the ground, and the consensus appears to be their rushing yards allowed stat is so low only because their opponents never saw the need to bother running when passing was working out so beautifully.
Long story short, the G-men are playing like Garbage-men on defense.