ReimTime said:
|
it's 4am here those go away and don't come back after midnight
Are you excited to see the combat system change? | |||
| Yes | 112 | 28.94% | |
| I will wait and see | 130 | 33.59% | |
| No | 145 | 37.47% | |
| Total: | 387 | ||
ReimTime said:
|
it's 4am here those go away and don't come back after midnight
| sc94597 said: Random encounters =/= turn based. Anyway an action game is not a substitute for a strategy game. I don't often hear people say chess is so archaic we should play football instead, for example. Appealing to people who aren't fans of a certain playstyle has the issue of possibly alienating those who enjoyed said playstyle. Both turnbased and real time RPGs have their niches to target even today . |
As long as the game stays true to the originals' mechanics while changing the base gameplay, I think it can be suitable replacement, it's better to have it this way than the other way around in my opinion. Football and Chess are completely different games, TBRPGs and ARPGs are both subgenres of an RPG, so mechanics between those are interchangeable.
When it comes to alienating people who loved the original, I can relate to that, but we need to understand that from a bussiness perspective, that could or couldn't be the best road to take while making the game, even if the game had a massive userbase back in the day, nothing guarantees that those guys will buy it again, there's also the problem of the game actually not being as good as everybody remember it being, which would affect review scores and hurt Square's reputation. I think Square is being intelligent here, they're trying to rebuild a new solid fanbase of new players and old players open to change who will likely check more of their new stuff out, they're better off that way, they know they're not SquareSoft, so they might as well embrace what they truly are instead of trying to keep up a facade.
I'm now filled with determination.
| Blag79 said: the people who will buy the game 75% of are old school fans the ones who lived it in the 90's we want the same game with better graphics they change much about it like the battle system and people like me in that 75% won't buy it mostly just the hardcore FF nuts which i was until 10 then 13 lets just not mention 12 eh if they change something as huge as the battle system they are literally throwing away money which is why 12-13-13-2-13-3 haven't sold as good as 7-8 the sales of the games have shown this it's common fing sense |
Statistics please ?
FFVII and FFVIII were the high point of the series and FFXIII sold a minimum of 7 million at an upwards of over 8 million copies. Those are respectable numbers for a series whether you like it or not ...
As for spin-offs such as FFXIII-2 or 3 then you may as well argue that FF went down the shitter with FFX-2 ...
Blag79 said:
|
Ok, I'll add them to my stockpile so I can make my posts seem more............................... tense
| Ka-pi96 said: Well then I can confirm that I won't be buying it, so fuck you Square Enix you fucking cunts. User was moderated for this post and others - Zekkyou |
Was this seriously moderated?
I've said far worse things about SE... things changed on this website.
I am the black sheep
"of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
hatmoza said:
Was this seriously moderated? I've said far worse things about SE... things changed on this website. |
Maybe we have someone working for Square in here, felt offended and reported.
Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1
fatslob-:O said:
Statistics please ? FFVII and FFVIII were the high point of the series and FFXIII sold a minimum of 7 million at an upwards of over 8 million copies. Those are respectable numbers for a series whether you like it or not ... As for spin-offs such as FFXIII-2 or 3 then you may as well argue that FF went down the shitter with FFX-2 ... |
http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=final+fantasy&publisher=&platform=&genre=&minSales=0&results=200 then think that this doesn't show all the FF7 pc sales and add together all the various copies it's plain to see the new games just don't sell as well they lost us the majority buyers
AbbathTheGrim said:
Maybe we have someone working for Square in here, felt offended and reported. |
I'm the Janitor. I reported it because I wanted to call them fucking cunts and he stole the oppurtunity from me!
| Blag79 said: http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=final+fantasy&publisher=&platform=&genre=&minSales=0&results=200 then think that this doesn't show all the FF7 pc sales and add together all the various copies it's plain to see the new games just don't sell as well they lost us the majority buyers |
The new games don't sell as well because their SPIN-OFFs ...
That's like saying SE lost a majority of it's customers because of FF Tactics ...
Why can't we use FF VI, FF VIII, FF IX, FFX, or even FFXII to guage the success of FFXIII ? FFVII set a high bar that no other FF will match in a long time ...
FFXIII is the fourth highest selling mainline FF title and that is a pretty good achievement all things considered ...
If you were expecting EVERY new FF game to be definitively better than the last then you have no one but yourself to blame ...