Lawlight said:
|
yes it is hundreds of millions, but the poveryty rate is about 25% of the population not 95%, still rather extreme just not as bad as you make it out to be.
Lawlight said:
|
yes it is hundreds of millions, but the poveryty rate is about 25% of the population not 95%, still rather extreme just not as bad as you make it out to be.
nanarchy said:
yes it is hundreds of millions, but the poveryty rate is about 25% of the population not 95%, still rather extreme just not as bad as you make it out to be. |
Yes, 25% of the population live on under $1.25 per day but 99.6% of the population live on under $5 a day.
bunchanumbers said:
|
Yes. It launched in 2003 as a sort of cheap, ultra compact N64 with key highlights from the library (MK64, Smash, OoT, Wave Race, and Super Mario 64 to name a few) plus online functionality for buying games, cloud saving, etc. It was an experiment to guard interest in affordable dedicated gaming hardware as well as the reasonability of the government. I think their lack of interest in bringing the Wii, Wii U, or 3DS there speaks volumes to how that experiment went :P
Nuvendil said:
Yes. It launched in 2003 as a sort of cheap, ultra compact N64 with key highlights from the library (MK64, Smash, OoT, Wave Race, and Super Mario 64 to name a few) plus online functionality for buying games, cloud saving, etc. It was an experiment to guard interest in affordable dedicated gaming hardware as well as the reasonability of the government. I think their lack of interest in bringing the Wii, Wii U, or 3DS there speaks volumes to how that experiment went :P |
Really? Nintendo should have invested more than that. Using a N64 to gauge interest when some of the best games Nintendo made were on Wii U? They should have launched the GCN there. And I still think that they should launch Wii U there. They just need to lower the price, or cut the gamepad and make a system that works with the Pro Controller.
bunchanumbers said:
|
I said it launched in 2003, that's well before the Wii U :P . And disposable income in 2003 in China was on average far lower than it is now so the 2003 GameCube with a very limited library wouldn't have been able to get down to the needed price point without becoming completely unprofitable.
As for launching the Wii U, why? It has been available on the grey market and in Hong Kong for a long time, doesn't have a big enough library to drive down the price, and the Ps4 and Xbone just failed in the region. There's no empirical evidence to suggest that China is a secure investment.
super6646 said:
that's by PPP, not GDP. Also Canada is number 10 on GDP :D. |
It says in the actual article that it's GDP.

Aeolus451 said:
|
Then its a mistake, as China's GDP is only 11 trillion. Also: http://knoema.com/nwnfkne/world-gdp-ranking-2015-data-and-charts
It shows Canada as number 10, and China as number 2. The numbers you showed was PPP, which is an unfair comparison.
super6646 said:
It shows Canada as number 10, and China as number 2. The numbers you showed was PPP, which is an unfair comparison. |
http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/10-richest-countries-in-the-world-by-2015-gdp-344692/
Where does it say ppp?

| Aeolus451 said:
Where does it say ppp? |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)
According to the 2014 data from IMF, what you listed almost matches with the data that the IMF got when it came to PPP ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
The actual list and order when it came to nominal GDP is described in the above second link ...
Aeolus451 said:
Where does it say ppp? |
Its a typo. The USA still does more GDP than China, and india is nowhere near 8 trillion in GDP.