By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Star Fox Wii U (2015) hardly looks better than Star Fox Assault (2005)

Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 21 June 2015

There is a reason why Dolphin is arguably the best emulator out there and that is why people should stop using bullshots to try and prove a point



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Around the Network
curl-6 on 21 June 2015

Uncharted 4 looks hardly any better than Uncharted 3



Low78wagon on 21 June 2015
bigtakilla said:
Low78wagon said:
Is it just me or does it seem like sf assault is a little faster paced?

Not faster paced, but there are more enemies. At the treehouse they stated the builds were early too and that there were going to be more enemies added before the game releases.

Ah. Definitely more enemy density in assault. Never played assault or adventures. My local game exchange has adventures for $15



illdill1987 on 01 July 2015

It looks terribad.... Lol I cannot believe that is what a union of platinum games and nintendo looks like. Straight garbage.



Volterra_90 on 01 July 2015
illdill1987 said:
It looks terribad.... Lol I cannot believe that is what a union of platinum games and nintendo looks like. Straight garbage.

And? It can be a good game with not-so-good visuals. People seem to forget that the game is running in two screens at 60fps. And I'm glad that they decided to cut visuals in order to get a stable 60fps experience, they could have improved visuals with a 30fps experience, like a lot of developers do nowadays, and there wouldn't be such a drama. 

EDIT: By the way, you can't use Dolphin emulator to prove this point. It's useless.



Around the Network
97alexk on 01 July 2015

Im seriously tired of these graphic threads. 



illdill1987 on 01 July 2015
Volterra_90 said:
illdill1987 said:
It looks terribad.... Lol I cannot believe that is what a union of platinum games and nintendo looks like. Straight garbage.

And? It can be a good game with not-so-good visuals. People seem to forget that the game is running in two screens at 60fps. And I'm glad that they decided to cut visuals in order to get a stable 60fps experience, they could have improved visuals with a 30fps experience, like a lot of developers do nowadays, and there wouldn't be such a drama. 

EDIT: By the way, you can't use Dolphin emulator to prove this point. It's useless.


I didn't forget that at all. Can it be a good game still? Maybe. But it would be like Jurassic world having stop motion claymation dinosaurs instead of computer generated ones. Nintendo needs to get with the times. I don't want to play Gamecube with a different controller for 15 years! Progress please... Not only that, they have a weak system but Starfox looks bad even for a Wii U game. Mario Kart 8 proves they can do way better as does Bayonetta 2 as does Xenoblade X.



Mr.Playstation on 01 July 2015

Star Fox: Zero looks fine, honestly. Not to mention that Star Fox: Assault has been natively upscaled to 1080P ( Source material was at best 480P ) and the levels in Star Fox: Zero are more varied per stage and have a lot more stuff going on at any given point in time.



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

illdill1987 on 01 July 2015
SpokenTruth said:
illdill1987 said:
It looks terribad.... Lol I cannot believe that is what a union of platinum games and nintendo looks like. Straight garbage.


This thread has been here for 10 days and in that you time you couldn't read all the way to the 6th post?


And you just used the word 'terribad'.  You are 28.  Don't do that to yourself.


I just saw the post today and had to let everyone know how terribly bad I thought the graphics looked... You condescending shitiot ;)



Volterra_90 on 01 July 2015
illdill1987 said:
Volterra_90 said:

And? It can be a good game with not-so-good visuals. People seem to forget that the game is running in two screens at 60fps. And I'm glad that they decided to cut visuals in order to get a stable 60fps experience, they could have improved visuals with a 30fps experience, like a lot of developers do nowadays, and there wouldn't be such a drama. 

EDIT: By the way, you can't use Dolphin emulator to prove this point. It's useless.


I didn't forget that at all. Can it be a good game still? Maybe. But it would be like Jurassic world having stop motion claymation dinosaurs instead of computer generated ones. Nintendo needs to get with the times. I don't want to play Gamecube with a different controller for 15 years! Progress please... Not only that, they have a weak system but Starfox looks bad even for a Wii U game. Mario Kart 8 proves they can do way better as does Bayonetta 2 as does Xenoblade X.

I don't think it looks that bad, all the games you mention I'm sure that they have more budget, and obviously the visuals are better. Star Fox was never a high-budget game, it's a mid-tier game and obviously it's not GC level, Dolphin doesn't count.... It could look better with more money and development time, but it's what it is. Let's hope the gameplay will be addictive enough. The performance will be great, as every Nintendo game this gen, so fuck the visuals, I want that amazing shoot'em up experience that was Star Fox 64.