Sixaxis with Super Monkey Ball would be great.

Although, on the topic, I don't see why they need to, getting good sales in the games chart shouldn't be about bundling a game. A game should sell on it's own merits, not because it comes with something.

Why?

Because that shows how good the game really is.....if they would have bundled Lair with a PS3 back in September, and Lair consequently sold millions, that still wouldn't have made Lair a good game

they aren't doing it because they are making and marketing their machines to HARDCORE GAMERS...which is exactly why they won't top 50mil in sales this generation

if they were targetting the casual crowd that got them to 120mil sales last gen, they would be doing things differently and having more success

I think a pack-in with fl0w would be frggin amazing, the game costs very little to purchase, has wonderful graphics (considering what it is :x ), has tilt control, and is created by Sony's first party so it's no real pressure on a third party developer.

 Nicely questioned. I find it more impressive if a game sells sumpteen million just buy good reviews, word of mouth and advertsing etc on it's own, not because it comes with a nessecary piece of kit for the console or the console itself.

I didn't like Wii Play with the exception of the tank game. If Sony or Microsoft want to make a game filled with creative and fun mini-games, I might look into it. However, I didn't like Wii Play enough to warrant interest in a similar thing on the PS3/360.

A big store here in Spain is selling Halo 3 for 64.90€, the controller for 44.90€.

But an offer of selling both for 69.90€. So for 5€ more you get the controller.

		Halo 3 La saga épica continúa con Halo 3, la esperadísima secuela de la exitosa y aclamada franquicia Halo. Ahora por 5€ más te puedes llevar el mando Mando Wireless Xbox 360
Precio: 64,90 € (10.798 PTA)

Here's the problem with copying Wiiplay if you're Sony or Microsoft imo. To date, Microsoft and Sony still try and dispute Wii's success by suggesting it's gimmicky, or it will fail, etc. etc. Now, we could debate that point all day, but the issue is, if Microsoft and Sony start copying Nintendo's ideas, doesn't that simply serve to validate Nintendo's methods? Sure they might sell some units, but it might cause some people to perceive Nintendo's actions in a more positive light, if they're worth stealing.

But that doesn't make sense from a financial perspective.  It's more advantageous to bundle the bad game than a good game as the good game would sell well bundled or not whereas the bad game will actually better in a bundle than it would otherwise.