It looks like it does need some polish but it looks far better than any GC game, such exxageration. 

Star Fox's graphics aren't bad. They just need better textures. The majority of the models and world pieces that aren't earthen terrain look pretty sharp too.

Gamers have been bitching that anything under 60 FPS is unacceptable. So Nintendo took it like a boss and decided to give you 60 FPS twice for the price of one!

You have to give nintendo credit though you have to have some really large balls to show off a game looking like that as your main game at e3. The graphics in this game are inexcusable this day and age.
Star fox used triangles and stuff for their design because of the limitations of the snes/64 in producing high poly models (obviously so for the snes) but doing this on a system almost 20years later is just some serious trolling.

Very true. I like the look of the game, and I'm sure it will get a little polish before release. 

Actually, the game was up and running just fine last E3. They didn't show it publicly because what they had then did indeed look like an N64 game, unlike what we saw today. It was a shell of a game, but it was functional.

Nah they're just really stupid, I mean you'd have to be to believe Amiibo Crossing Party 11 was a good idea.

.

I think it's more the art style than bad graphics. I think it could use some touching up cause it looks uneven right now, but I expect that to be fixed by release. I'm talking directly to the contrast in water to the fighters and some enemies. But like I said, like with most Nintendo games, it will likely be fixed by the time it's released.

Welcome to the wii u hardware, providing "next gen games" since the arrival of the ps3 and xbox 360

Moderated by -PwerlvlAmy