Machina said: It's pretty simple really. PS4 has managed 50% because the competition has sold abysmally, especially the Wii U. Wii didn't manage it, despite selling incredible amounts, because both of its competitors managed to achieve strong sales. It's a testament to the sorry state of console gaming this generation that the PS4 has managed to achieve 50% market share almost by default. |
If anything, it only points to the Wii's short legs that it never achieved 50%. The other consoles only really hit their stride in the 3rd year, which also just happened to be the peak year for the Wii. The Wii was able to bring a new customer to console gaming, but hardly any of them stayed. In the end, it really had little impact on how we play games.
And the PS1 and PS2 both had 50%+ by default. Was gaming in a sorry state, then? Or was console gaming still alive and well, and those consoles were just seen by the majority to offer the best bang for your buck? I'm going with the latter. Same goes for this gen.
kowenicki said: This isnt even a thing really... I had to laugh when I saw that thread. The Wii being market leader and not reaching 50%, ending at 35% or so is the anomoly. PS4 reaching 50% is the norm for the market leader, actually 50% is low. PS2 (approx 75%) and PS1 (approx 70%+) smashed 50%. It was just a thread that wasnt required and only created to wind up Ninty fans. Ps2 and Ps1 both had far better marketshare than Ps4 will achieve, but obviosuly that comparison isn't as convenient.
|
Don't you think it would be smart to see how high PS4 can jump, and possibly how low XBO can fall, before judging how much "far better" is?