Again: There's nothing at all stopping him from having a say. He merely lacks the means to obstruct the woman carrying the baby from obtaining an abortion. He can take out an ad in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and the Chicago Tribune voicing his opinions if he has the money to run such an ad.

Bad generalizing,and super offensive you make yourself to seem worse than the people you consider bad,since you use inflammatory comments!

Mr I'm against and I'm not religious,so would you mind keep the generalizations out of here,and I used arguments that isn't related to religion,I said how my heart feels about it and I closed my answer ceclaring that women of course can do what ever they want with their body,it's their,they decide but I can have my opinion,do you allow me?I included men to the story,so I'm not aiming  just to women!I said eveyrone can be against without imposing to women what to do,and a type of close-minded person is the person that does generalizations and unjust attacks!I adore gays so I can't be close-minded...

tak13 said:

Same opinion here,I'm against and certainly NOT going by religion but by my heart!There are many infertile women or women who want a kid but they are in an age that can't conceive,and are able to be great  mothers,love kids and they would kill to have one!

Also,it's very ludicrous and annoying that some presenting that being against it's like saying to the women what to do with their body,anyone can be against without imposing to any woman what to do or not to do...Also,later you might regret it,and then it would be too late and woefelly, surplus that abortion can cause permament damage,you know what I mean!

Dear women if you have an undesirable pregnancy,it's not baby's fault,it's a fault of your/partener's carelessness...CONTRACEPTION LADIES AND CONDOMS GENTLEMEN

It might be a little bit exterme but I'll say it!Thousand times more preferable to abandon it so someone else take cares of it(Surely,double check to where/who you leave it,because there are some bad people/places and the baby deserves a good enviroment)or give it in orphanage than kill it and depriving it the present of life!

Most irksome thing is that some women have obsessions that they would kill it just to oppose to religion which forbids that,just to be ''revolutionar'' and ''non-conformist''!Moronic!(If you do it do it for yourself)Of course they can do what ever they want to their body,it's their,they decide!My aspect though....

No religious arguments,no women-control mood,I don't know where you saw these,and If you knew me well,you would know that I would never use religion...We are not allowed to have our opinion,muzzle us!I repeat,I'm not imposing anything to anyone by being against to something...And If I'm supporting my opinion with respect,politeness and objectivity then,I'm ok!

1. Fetus

2. Not PRO abortion, PRO choice. No one is sitting there gleeful when they are getting an abortion like some diabolical super-villain.

I'm atheist, and still anti-abortion, but as I said if someone decides to make the stupid mistake of terminating, that is their choice. I would judge the action on my personal believe according to the reasons, but wouldn't misthreat the person... so all your points on that doesn't apply to me.

On the contraception I said my opinion, myself and other family members are fruit of failed preventive, and I'm very gratefull for it. And when doing sex the risk still exist, I'm still against abortion even when precaution is take, becaue you assume the risk, but as i said is the decision of the 2 involved... and you know several people live in orgy style life and think pregnancy is an inconvenience that can be neutralized after if necessary. But I also doesn't think the government should interfere, but rigid control must be done to allow for proper diligency, abuse and all the parties right.

You've literally just solidifed the meaning of POTENTIAL. It means you can but it doesn't mean you WILL. I CAN be in a boyband, it doesn't mean I WILL. My sperm CAN develop into life it doesn't mean it WILL if it never meets an egg. It has the potential. 

Ohh the matters part is purely opinion, but if the potential matters then a lot of 13 year olds are fucked. 

Thread needs a poll.

You've set a standard with your first post. Welcome to Vgchartz. 

Both ways of dealing with the drug abuse have their upsides and their downsides. Many people see lighter punishments as encouraging drug abuse by removing the negative consequences, while jail time obviously has the issues you pointed out such as increasing peoples criminal status. I don't think there is enough data to make a definitive conclusion, but there are multiple sides...

Also, I think you need to understand the difference between legalization and decriminalization. Legalization would have distribution of cocaine next to cigarettes, while decriminalization would change the penalties. Which are you in favor of?

And people who think helping people rather than punishing them as a way of encouraging it are stupid and they probably would've used drugs anyway.

That is an oversight my bad, decriminalisation definitely. 

You were very disrespectful on 2 occasions on calling me ineducated on the matter and talking shovel. So yes you regard yourself superior.

Yes there were cases of less than 22 weeks, so your argument that life is just after 24 weeks because that is when it can live in the outside world is lost or should retract (and keep retracting while science advances to support birth at even younger age). There is no such thing as not suffering at all from 80 years smoking, you can say they hadn't cancer or anything like that, but show a clean lungue from someone that smoke for 80 years (really smoked, not one cigar every blue moon). And cigars only affect the idiot smoking, so it's a completely different matter.