Not really since its called a remaster lol 

For something that's basicially just a simple port, $40 is too much. The God of War Collection on PS3 was $40 and it was two games.

You can even get the God of War Saga Collection for under $20 at this point. These are reasons why people are underwhelmed by this port on PS4.

I always find it unfair how when PS(mainly) and Xbox gets remasters, whether its first or third party games, there's a lot of negativity about it. But when Nintendo gets some ports you hear nothing but praises or at least nothing negative really. Nintendo had Zelda MM, Mario 64, Xenoblade, Pokemon, Resident Evil Zero, 1, 4 etc... I'm honestly trying to recall about any negativity when Nintendo announced a port. If people complain about Nintendo's ports, its not about Nintendo getting ports but their decision of games to port.

Anyways just my observation, every company does it yet some gets hated on while others dont as much.

OT: Opener made great points as to why GoW3 is an acceptable port. Personally I believe, aside from it being the 10yr anniversary, GoW3 is being ported because it'll give gamers a refresh of the what happened last...in time for GoW4? It would be nice if the GoW3 port can include a brief clip summary of all the previous GoW games so fans and newcomers wont feel as lost. Just like how the Yakuza games 3 & 4 both gave summaries for their previous games before them.

If MS does a release of single Gears with no improvments other than resolution and frame rate, I'd be extremely disappointed. But I think MS knows better not to do that.

However, putting 3 or 4 games in a single collection with all DLC like Halo:MCC is obviously what fans want.

The only way where that would make sense is if they were gonna get laid off. Still, i find it hard to believe more programmers dont speed up development, there is always something to code until the game ships.

No, I'm saying those Wii U games are ports, not remasters. So your whole "The PS4 is criticized the most for its remasters" is incorrect in that circumstance, because those games were never criticized for being remasters because they're not remasters. 

Whats the difference though?  A remaster is pretty much a port.  If you mean to say the Wii U ports didn't offer upgrades then actually that's a worse situation then GoW3.  Where was the outrage for that? 

When a painting or a picture gets redone with the intent of a higher quality then it is officially a remaster of a previous painting or picture.

A remaster is a remaster. Now I'm not trying to be an internet parent here and tell you what to say but maybe you should try to know what you are talking about next time?

...You were literally just trying to argue that people's complaints about GOWIII Remaster being a port isn't valid, and now you're saying it is a port? Pick a side, dude. 

Some of the Wii U ports actually did offer upgrades. Games like Deus Ex and Arkham City made full use of the gamepad. I'm talking about graphically, as almost none of the games made full use of the Wii U's technical capabilities.

Regardless, people did complain about the ports being so late and many of them not running properly. Did you not see all the (rightful) bitching about Watch Dogs?

Just stop. Seriously. You're arguing yourself into a corner.

So you're trying to say games like Watch Dogs and Darksiders II were remastered on the Wii U?