By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Has Crytek entered a deal with Nintendo?

Mummelmann said:
The only interesting thing about Crytek is that they own Free Radical Games, besides the possibility of something like Timesplitters, I don't see much value in Crytek. And since they're tech nerds, Nintendo seems like a fairly odd partner for them to choose for their own developed games as well.

The sad thing is that Crytek is not really doing anything with the TimeSplitters IP..



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Around the Network

Sonic Boom used Crytek engine. Kill it with fire



SjOne said:
Sonic Boom used Crytek engine. Kill it with fire

Sonic Boom or the Crytek engine?



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

I think I would have preferred they bought Crytek.



kowenicki said:
Mystery solved.

They bought 10% of DeNA.

Thats confirmed? Quite interesting... seems like theyre serious with the whole mobile gaming business



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Around the Network
Ka-pi96 said:
A deal Nintendo made a year ago and a deal that Crytek made recently?

Don't think they are related.

Nintendo listed the $100 million cost a year ago. Read the article I linked to. The Crytek deal isn't a new one - they've just released new information about the deal that stabilised Crytek's financial situation a little under a year ago; the info was provided in an interview done recently.

Here's the key part of that article:

"Speaking to Develop at GDC, Crytek co-founder Faruk Yerli and head of PR Jens Schaefer said rather than securing funding from an investor as many had believed, the injection of money had come from a new licensing deal that it had been working on for a "long time"."

Notice the past tense? And notice the "working on for a long time"? They had been working on it for a long time, even back then. Which means it would make sense for Nintendo to be establishing the "acquisition" somewhere around the time they actually did.

Another interesting thing, which has only just happened: Nintendo announced NX. Curious timing, given that the heading of the article I provided was "Publisher hopes to announce partner soon". If Nintendo didn't want the partnership announced until after they'd started speaking about NX, then everything lines up pretty well.



kowenicki said:
Mystery solved.

They bought 10% of DeNA.

DeNA is Japanese. We know that the "tech acquisition" wasn't Japanese. Besides, they announced that Nintendo "will" acquire 10% of DeNA, not that they already had.



Aielyn said:
kowenicki said:
Mystery solved.

They bought 10% of DeNA.

DeNA is Japanese. We know that the "tech acquisition" wasn't Japanese. Besides, they announced that Nintendo "will" acquire 10% of DeNA, not that they already had.

Indeed, that deal will be made on 2April at the latest, and its roughly $180m and not $100m. Could you really be right about this Aielyn? What purpose would Nintendo have of acquiring something from Crytek? Might as well have bought the entire company for that amount... 



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Hell no! Why should they do games for a child friendly console while their games are Shooters?



Dr.Vita said:
Hell no! Why should they do games for a child friendly console while their games are Shooters?


you already answered. Shooters < = > kids... you know