By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Reggie: "We think deeply about our product names"

 

...

Reggie pls. 113 53.30%
 
Cool story bro. 37 17.45%
 
I don't even... 62 29.25%
 
Total:212
RealGamingExpert said:
ExplodingBlock said:

"New 3DS"
"Wii U"

Still waiting for "New Wii U".


I'll be furious if a New Wii U launches. It means that my Wii U is now worthless and the New Wii U will get exclusives I can't play on my Wii U.

.... I could have swore I had this conversation about the 3DS.



Around the Network
the_dengle said:
Don't blame Reggie for those; rather, pity him. The names come from Japan, and he has the impossible job of justifying them to American journalists and investors.

Not the only issue NoA and NoE have to deal with thanks to NoJ.
PlayStations biggest strength is that they act as an international company.



Honestly, the only great name in Nintendo's HISTORY for a console was the "Gameboy". Everything else has been dull and without imagination.

To be fair, the same is pretty much true for Sony and Microsoft, too.

Sega got it right with name front "Dreamcast", "Saturn".

Just goes to show how unimportant a good name is.

"new iPad", anyone?



I always wondered why they just didn't use a different name like they did back in the day. Famicom was NES. Super Famicom was the SNES. I'm thinking Reggie needs to flex in front of Boss Iwata and demand a different name.



Sorry Reggie, but i dont believe you. I think the japanese branch comes up with these dumb names and you just have to roll with them.



Around the Network

Perfect example of nintendos love for painting its problems as its advantages, this and the "we still dont like annual franchises" crap.



Ka-pi96 said:
New 3DS I can understand.

Wii U however...


I feel the opposite, actually. If you listen to the early talks about the philosophy behind the console, the name makes sense. Wii was supposed to bring everyone together. The name was written in a way pronouncable in every language, the iis were people standing together, etc. The Wii U wanted to continue to draw people together, but also focus on the individual, hence the creation of miiverse, a refocusing (or so they promised) on the hardcore gamer, the gamepad allowing for asynchronous multiplayer giving a unique experience for a particular player (hence launching with Nintendo Land), and so they stuck with the English-pronoun-written-in-a-more-universally-pronounable-way naming pattern to reflect their new philosophy. It was a complex message to sell and their marketing team failed spectacularly. Did the name make things worse? Maybe, but you can't say they didn't put significant thought into it. Certainly more so than "it's a new model of the 3DS line so let's call it the New 3DS."



Cobretti2 said:

People really have short term memories?

Nintendo explained the whole Wii U name. Wii was for we play together and now You can play on your own too  (i.e. targeting the hardcore gamer and hardcore 3rd party games).

Sadly their vision was too Japanese deep in thinking and the average westerner don't get it. They just see it as a letter slapped on.

In any case the name alone is not why the Wii U is failing in sales. It is how you present the gaming device.


Glad I'm not the only one that remembers this. : )



No the naming is terrible. You might think about it, but it's still terrible.

Wii -> Wii U. Oh it has Wii in the name, but U? Oh it has a tablet. It's a peripheral.

3DS -> N3DS. Is it like DS -> 3DS? It plays 3DS games, but it doesn't have N3DS games...

They're not good, and trying to be "clever" and "deep" is just going to confuse consumers.



Won bet with t3mporary_126 - I correctly predicted that the Wii U's LTD at the end of 2014 would be closer to 9 million than 10 million. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6673287

Well then Reggie.....think again.