By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Obama's Continued War on Human Rights

curl-6 said:
Of course it did, it's about guns and Obama. Apparently to Americans that's like someone walking into a Smash Bros tournament and shouting "Melee sucks!" Guaranteed to start a debate. :p

 

Truth. US politics are so humorous. 

Edit: Unlike curl, I am most certainly not joking around.



Official Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE Thread

                                      

Around the Network
curl-6 said:
Skullwaker said:
Holy shit this thread caught on fire fast.

Of course it did, it's about guns and Obama. Apparently to Americans that's like someone walking into a Smash Bros tournament and shouting "Melee sucks!" Guaranteed to start a debate. :p

EDIT: No offense US-ers, I'm just joking around.

It is a funny post. :) 



sc94597 said:
It doesn't matter really what he's trying to do.. There is a high demand for personal gun ownership in the U.S. There is a high supply of guns in the U.S. There is a large political movement for personal gun ownership in the U.S. Obama is constrained here.


True enough. I'm not much for gun culture myself, but it seems like Obama keeps picking battles he can't win. Then again, the conservatives of this country aren't willing to negotiate over anything lately, it seems. The average citizen has no representation in Washington, with a few bi-partisan exceptions.



Retro Tech Select - My Youtube channel. Covers throwback consumer electronics with a focus on "vid'ya games."

Latest Video: Top 12: Best Games on the N64 - Special Features, Episode 7

sc94597 said:
MDMAlliance said:


His username is Socialist Slayer.  

Is it the slayer bit which show the bias or the "anti socialist" bit? I doubt the OP is actually literally meaning slayer, and I don't see how being a slayer predisposes one to beliefs that gun rights should be more liberal (in the classic sense.) I addressed how being anti-socialist doesn't necessarily imply a bias toward gun rights, as there are socialists who are proponents of gun rights. 

When I say that his name is Socialist Slayer, I mean it in a way that he has a name that implies some form of extremism.  Not exactly meaning it predisposes him to gun rights.  If you read his signature, you'll kind of get what I mean.  Plus, I know he's the guy who used to be "fps_d0minator" or something along like that.



MDMAlliance said:

Not exactly meaning it predisposes him to gun rights.  If you read his signature, you'll kind of get what I mean.  

Ah I get ya. I have signatures off, so I can't see anything. 



Around the Network
sc94597 said:
MDMAlliance said:

Not exactly meaning it predisposes him to gun rights.  If you read his signature, you'll kind of get what I mean.  

Ah I get ya. I have signatures off, so I can't see anything. 

its a picture of most of my guns.

though im not sure what my user name has to do with anything, about me supporting the constitution, and wanting more liberal gun rights



 

SocialistSlayer said:
sc94597 said:

Ah I get ya. I have signatures off, so I can't see anything. 

its a picture of most of my guns.

though im not sure what my user name has to do with anything, about me supporting the constitution, and wanting more liberal gun rights

I'm not referring to the picture of your guns.  I am referring to a line of text you have in your signature.  It should be pretty obvious which one it is.



MDMAlliance said:
SocialistSlayer said:

its a picture of most of my guns.

though im not sure what my user name has to do with anything, about me supporting the constitution, and wanting more liberal gun rights

I'm not referring to the picture of your guns.  I am referring to a line of text you have in your signature.  It should be pretty obvious which one it is.

oh, i forgot what was all in my sig, im guessing the 'Molon Labe' is what you are talking about

and im am not fpsdominator



 

sc94597 said:
Insidb said:

The 2nd amendment was a compromize with the southern states to retain the Union,

You can't be serious...

Anyway, the first gun controls were ironically set into place so that Blacks couldn't get weapons and were most prominent in the South


lol in the future people are going to look back on the people of the past ( our current era ) who claim the constitution rights they have  currently are outdated and so we should give them up

they'll look back and curse those people because of consequences that are going to be brought about

 

i cannot actually believe that people are saying that their rights are outdated and so they should give them up while acknowledging that those who rule over them as a result only gain more and more power correspondingly

 

it truly is sad but it is by design one way to enslave a people is to convince them that they don't need or deserve their rights and that they are irresponsible and so someone has to take the responsiblity they can't handle themselves



I think it's time to become a gun owner