xbox doesnt have to be killing it in the us or europe to require namcos attention for a game to release on it though they have a nice userbase that more japanese devs should take note of . dbz and naruto are releasing on xbox one and I can guarantee tekken 7 on xbox one will outsell both of them by comparison. 

If it sells like Tekken 6 perhaps. But if it sells like Tekken tag 2 then it doesnt seem to be the case.

We need to evaluate how popular the Tekken series still is. Its been in decline and sales of tag 2 on x360 were slugish and actually Ninja storm 3 sold more than tag 2 on the platform in the US (according to VGC). Its food for thought. This in the region where the 360 was leader. Can't really blame them if they did opt for an exclusive release.

Not defending it, just saying that it wouldnt be totally surprising if they did. There is sense in the business decision. It all depends on how expensive the game would be to port.

I doubt it's not coming to Xbox. Even if it wouldn't sell as much as PlayStation it would still be making money and is “easy money“ for them unless they are paid to not do it.

That's a lot of nonsense in a short post. Do people really still think there is forced parity? If so MS is failing at enforcing that.

I know they recently came into money from selling a studio but we can't expect them to buy every Japanese fighter.

Yea I usually trust vgchartzs on their sales but their tracking of tekken tag 2 seemed a bit shotty. I remember it having shipped liek 1.5 million back in march 2013 on ps3 and 360, by now it has to be close to 2 million in total. i would say the 360 version has to have like 35-40% of those sales. I will say tekkens sales have slowed in the years, but its still up there with the biggest selling in its genre and namco has to recognize the fanbase they made for themselves by releasing it on 360 last gen. It's probably only behind smash and street fighter and mortal kombat sometomes. 

I don't see anything saying it's a PlayStation exclusive. And no way is it going to Vita. The Vita is a bit weaker than the PS3, and the PS4 is way more powerful than the PS3.

Almost all Bandai Namco games come to the Vita. Sword Art Online: Lost Song, God Eater 2: Rage Burst, One Piece Pirate Warriors 3, Super Robot Wars Z3, J-Stars Victory VS+, Digimon Cyber Sleuth... I don't know why they shouldn't bring Tekken on the Vita?

I don't get it either, recently there's been some flux of J fighting games appearing on Steam, Naruto has been on PC before and the new one and DBZ game are coming to PC too, it seems like they have something against PC, either that or they are blind to seeing the PC market, like you said it's bigger than the XB1 and PS4, they could make even more money by including a PC release and to those that say "there's so fanbase on PC" there could be if they actually tried, this is the thing people keep forgetting is that they have to try in order to form a fanbase on another platform, if they don't try nothing happens.

Also I noticed that last tweet of his was rather insulting.

Chazore most of these console games sell a lot more on consoles. saying the install base means nothing when the vast majority of their revenue comes from consoles.

I do think it's worth it porting to PC but maybe they want to focus all their efforts on the big money makers and port it later to Pc. A lot of publishers seem to do that.

So PC is nothing compared to an Xbox and a Playstation these days?, I question that because we've seen PC making top revenue before and selling a lot more in the past and data has proven it but one japanese guy for little to no reason decides he wants it to be exclusive to one platofmr, you said consoles make more revenue then why isn't it on Xbox and Wii U?, limiting yourself to one platform does not make you tonnes of money compared to a decent multiplat that actually didn't botch up expectations and under deliver or come out bugged to hell.

I've seen PC exclusive games with midding capabilities thrive and make money for years.

Looking at the last tweet spoke volumes to me, anyone off the street could say they are "an acient Steam user", should I totally take their word for it even though they've never proven or shown so before?, no I shouldn't and I have no reason to take his word for it with the lines that followed after claimign he was an "ancient" Steam user.

Also I'm still seeing a lot of "published" games on Steam more or less a day after, the same day or a day ebfore on Steam so they still make more than enough from Steam/PC in general, I shouldn't have to grab Yuri and others into this kind of dicussion with someone who's not versed with PC, not trying to be hostile but it's simply wrong to state PC isn't worth money or doesn't make enough of it.