I didn't say the game wouldn't be original. I said Ready at Dawn's own original IP would be ok-ish at best. Big difference.

Well, since we don't have demos anymore, what do you rant people to do? Blindly buy a game and hope they can return it?

Perhaps broken (when not completely broken) Games offer things like fun, replay value, longer campaigns with more gameplay...

This was expected from me. Thought this game looked terrible for months.

Alot worse than I would have expected. It's their own fault but it's a shame as the game had potential, although I think it still has as a franchise, will have to wait and see if they are making a sequel.

Figured it would average a low 70,so a 66 atm surprises me a lot

Huh?  How can a broken game be fun and have replay value when it is...idk...broken?

I hope developers get the message : developers! Don't bother making beautiful and sophisticated games like The Order or Evolve, just make slow and ugly games like MH4U, the press approves!

LOL. If that was the case then FFXIV didn't have to be remade. Still the original XIV got a bad score tho.. perhaps it was too broken.

I guess this comes down to a question of what is better, a game with bugs that also has a lot of interesting ideas and fun gameplay, or a game without bugs that lacks interesting ideas and fun gameplay? Like, Halo MCC was surely fun, and if you could actually get into a match near launch, it was a great time, despite the problems with their internet. Does that deserve to be rated higher than a game that lacks bugs but just doesn't give the same highs?

My personal opinion (although I usually apply it when talking about anime or movies) is that something that has amazing highs next to the lows will be more enjoyable than something that is middling the whole time.

Oh so sophisticated...if only the picture has moustaches