This x2. This was a long time coming.

oh come on, the interviewer is annoying because Molyneux is the biggest liar in the video game industry. The interview is 100% accurate to express annoyance from the fanbases, after all it's absurd that people donating 100+ Euros for this game's development, it reached its goal, and its been delayed for years. it's just terribly poor organization and planning on Molyneux and his team's side

I understand traditionally an interviewer is supposed to ask questions in a relatively unbiased manner, but in this case this guy Peter is just an absolute tool. him repeating over and over that his lies were simply him getting excited and exaggerating with 'hope' is just stupid. lame.

people are just too soft, the ones defending him and acting like he's getting a hard wrap don't include anyone who donated or who has previously donated to game projects and been let down like this 

literally legally speaking Molyneux probably already could be sued (if he had big enough donors) as their is something really suspicious with his claims and the actual developmental time of this game

mistakes? sorry but tricking people to donate to your game with fake descriptions, release dates, rewards for donors, etc. etc. etc. that's a bit more extreme

That interviewer makes molyneux look like the sympathetic person.

I say while the interview is long, and it gets emotional from the interviewer stand point. It was really NECESSARY. Someone should hold him ACCOUNTABLE.

I think that the interviewer was a dick, but that Peter did a terrible job of answering the questions. I mean Peter says he has ALWAYS taken longer than expected to make a game.

OK! So if you ALWAYS take longer then why don't you account for that when you tell people how long it will take you to make a game?!

He doesn't have any credibility anymore. He lost it with Fable 3.

Probably true. I'm really resisting the urge to be smug right now!

Terrible interviewer. And I say this as someone who HATES the sort of person Molyneux is and who just wishes he'd go back to a big publisher and never, ever try crowdfunding anything he makes ever again, while also never talking to the press while he's at it. I also say it as someone who firmly believes that anytime Molyneux hypes up a new game (like the one he is already talking about before Godus' corpse has cooled) every media outlet on the planet should include, with their report on the new game, a detailed list on Molyneux's many, many, many broken assurances and starry-eyed fictitious shortcomings, just to make sure that even the most fresh-faced consumer is well aware how full of nonsense the man is. Heck, I even say it as someone who'd WANT to have seen Molyneux get finally called on his bull and held accountable to the actions he always shrugs off with 'Yup, totally my fault, BUT MY NEXT GAME WILL BE AWESOMESAUCE!'

So why do I disapprove of the interviewer? Because it IS too aggressive. I'm not saying 'Poor Peter,' I'm saying 'Jesus, Maintain Control Of The Narrative, Walker!' As frustrating as Molyneux's evasions, half-truths and either-foolishly-or-conveniently-terrible-memory was, you need to highlight his lies, his inconsistencies, his foolish qualities, present them in such a way that the reader cannot fail to miss them, and then move on. Do not try to convince the MAN you are interviewing that they exist, especially when he is so notoriously hard to pin down on anything as Molyneux. This isn't about Molyneux, as unfortunately no legal action can be taken for his particular brand of Snake-Oil-ness, but instead about creating a concise and rock solid piece of journalism that, for a new generation of readers, will introduce them to 'Why You Should Not Trust Peter Molyneux,' and for an older generation of readers who already kiiiind of know he schtick, hammer home just how extensive it is. Sure, Molyneux can choose to defend himself if he so chooses, but he should be the one trying to lay siege to Walker's castle, as it were, not the other way around, and simply because Molyneux's attempts to justify his actions would only serve to highlight just how unjustifiable they all are.

Heck, I've known Molyneux was like this for years, but it wasn't until I saw the most recent Jimquisition on the subject, (basically, pointing out the cycle of Molyneux hyping up his new game while trashing the old one, great episode, unforgiving tone but NOT nearly as combative as this article's interviewer,) I didn't know just how incredibly CONSISTENT and predictable it was. o_O The man has basically gotten away with pulling the exact same trick over and over and over and over, and this is the first time to memory anyone's really pointed it out to him.

"We could" is not a promise. It's merely stating that it's a possibility. Had he said, "we WILL", than that quote would mean something.