No it doesn't. That's not what he's talking about. He said 60. Only you say unlimited. Unlimited isn't good enough. 

If this was the case PC games wouldn't be allowed to go to 120fps because it would be 'unfair' for those who don't have 120hz monitors/TV's. That is a null point. This option give people choice. Therefore you can play at 30fps because you believe it to be 'fine' this doesn't take that option away from you.

When main stream TVs are 120htz as a standard, we damn sure better be getting 120fps games. Everything is wrong with 30fps.

An unfair advantage!? You've got to be joking. That's like saying Rodger Federer has an unfair advantage because Rafael Nadal shot himself in the foot.

If they are making a PC version then surely it's very little extra work to establish 2 fixed settings for the console versions. Essentially you'd be looking at minimum PC Specs type performance for the 60fps and moderate PC specs type performance for the 30fps. For exclusives it's not quite the same.

I think giving people the option is a good idea, but typically as I only play SP games and pretty much ignore the MP component of all games I'd probably go for 30fps almost every time.

Then the people who want 60 will be at a disadvantage and some possibly becoming motion sick due to the restraint of people who want to stay stuck at 30 for the forseeable future, many games should be reaching 60fps by now, our eyes see more than that anyway throughout our life.

OT: I'd want FPS first but really when it comes to PC you should be getting both and not losing one or the other a lot of the time.

I guess the topic is not about a game above 30 fps which has a "lock" option because many people don't like fluctuating framerates but games that are locked 30 for visual eye-candy and another option for 60 fps which would mean visuals to be cut back significantly.

so what you are saying is if I'm running a game online at 120 fps and you are running at 60fps we will see things at the same time? Wrong, I will see things before you, it maybe a millisecond I'm too lazy to do the math but it is an advantage, how ever small, then if you get into pings and it will come down to who has the highest framerate and bed ping. And my point will be proved when Microsoft launch cross platform gaming with pc and xbox one. Then we will know for sure.

id always pick 30fps

I don't think this will happen as it would take way more effort for devs to keep either locked. This means devs would develop for both targets and you have to take in designers so you don't cut off elements that should still be there.

I don't say you then have to develop the game twice but the effort to give you both options is way too high and won't bring much more money, if any.

no its more like saying Rafael nadal got sand in his eyes. Look we will find out when cross platform gaming launches on the xbox one,