He took Murdered: Soul Suspect to prove his point? Makes the intention of this video pretty much obsolete.

Edit: While the video in the OP is just poor (he took a really bad example and has nothing to back up his only and weak argument), the video that RCTJunkie posted is excellent. I agree with everything being said there about the current state of game reviews.

Him using Murdered actually hits the nail on the head.

You played it?

If not, I think you've just proven his point perfectly.

Screw games journalism, I'll just catch a let's play and see if a game seems worth my time.

Hell Yeah :D

Yes, I played it and it's not even mediocre. It's a crap game.

Poor? So your just gonna discredit everything he said just because YOU don't like Murdered Soul Suspect. Real nice buddy.

Fair enough, I stand corrected. I do think he has a point though and perhaps this game just wasn't for you. Some people loved Infamous: Second Son but I found a dull and uninspired experience.

Everything he said? All he said is reviewers do copy/paste jobs and he has nothing to back his opionion up. In fact he discredits reviewers by accusing them to copy opinions and by taking one game almost no one liked except HIM and a few others. See how that goes? What you accuse me of, I can easily take and throw against the guy who made this bad video.

Forget the unclever video you posted, mate, and watch the good one that RCTJunkie posted. It's ten times better and has actually an extremely valid point.

Increcibly poor reasoning.

So a game called "boredom simulator 2015" where nothing you can do is exciting deserves a 10/10 then?
In the end, a bad game is a bad game, even if it's called "A Bad Game".

Now Murdered got a 6/10 on Metacritic. That's not even bad, that's still decent.