so why are gamers ignoring the system? 

Lets be honest nintendo stopped trying to compete along time ago.  All they care about is selling enough to turn a profit, and survive its why their systems have weaker specs and rely heavier on 1st than 3rd party software.  Unfortuantely for nintendo in terms of competing (especially against sony) that hasnt worked out so well the last 20 years in terms of being the industry leader they once were prior to sony's arrival.

Looks like gamers are ignoring all the systems. The problem with Wii U is weak and reused content, then again; having the two models, black Wii U and white Fuck U aren't really building trust to Nintendo, as I don't think I'm the only one who can't understand why I can't choose which colour to buy, as my options are either to get the black which I don't want or the gimped down version which I don't want.

Except that Nintendo isn't turning in profit, which is the bad part here (then again, this forces Nintendo to do something about it). Consoles have always had "weaker specs", at least those who wish to continue to next generation, as making losses have destroyed nearly every company - which is what happened with SCE too that was discontinued and Playstation was put under other division a couple of years back.

I dont know why so few people discount the $400 price point for PS4. At the $5/600 price point the console sold 10.5 million by its 2nd new year(having 1 month at the $400 price point) and 21 million by its 2nd(obviously 400 that entire year).

Now PS4 has 8 million more at this point but its been cheaper the whole time. If PS3 were $400 out of the gate PS4 would have likely done drastically better(PS3 was a drastically better system than the PS4 after year one.)

Then the article is nonsense because none of this makes the PS4 a more gaming system. And the U pad is so far from a gimmick that it's ridiculous.  People throw the "g" word around like it's nothing. The game pad has more than proven it's viability for gaming. 

This has nothing to do with the U not being a gaming first system. It has more to do with hype and the ridiculous notion that Nintendo is for kids. Nintendo has done a terrible job of over coming that misperception.  That's the reason. 

He was talking about the library, not a handfull of games that stood out but all the games combined.
And while i'd say which console's library is the best is up to personal perference, the PS4 is likely to have a vastly bigger and more diverse collection of games compared to the WiiU (and maby XB1 as well), and is so likely to (better) satisfy the demands/tastes of more people.

Also the quality of games is (at least partially subjective), but with the sheer amount of games PS4 is getting there is bound to be a decent amount of good games.

So wihle for you the system with the best library might be a Nintendo one, for him/me and a number of other people it's going to be the ps4. And neither will be objectively wrong or right but that's tha beauty of different oppinions.

MS DRM reveal really pushed many to Sony, It was a total blunder and I'm not sure how they didn't see it coming.

If that was true then how come they are losing so badly.  They had the same head start that the xbox had last gen and it took sony less than 6 months to wipe the floor with them and thats with no price cut or superior exclusive librairy.  Face it most gamers think its a gimmick, and believe me i have talked to plenty of people, even die hard nintendo supporters who say that the u-pad is a step to far away from a traditional controller and turned them off from it thats just the reality.