1. Will Have The Bigger World? (In Actually Traveling Land Size)

Well, since all consoles use discs that fit 25GB per layer, but since Xenoblade will use lower level graphics compared to FFXV, it could potentially create a larger world if you look at it that way. (Also depends on how many CG movies are used in the games) But I think it'll just come down to design choice, so I'm not sure.
Traveling by car seems to be an important aspect of FFXV though, and I'm not sure how important traveling with a mech is in X, so if I were to guess, I'll say FFXV.

2. Will Have More A Depth Feel to It? (Talking World, as in Landscapes/Citys/etc)

I haven't played Xenoblade, only the other Xeno games, so it's hard for me to compare fully. But I would guess Xenoblade will, based on the last few FF games.

3. Will Have The Better Combat?

Again, because I haven't played Xenoblade, it would be hard to make a qualified guess. I didn't like the combat system in XIII and XIII-2 (even though it had improvements), but the combat system of XIII-3 seems excelent so far (started playing it recently), and is what it should have been from the start.
Xenogears and Xenosaga had a pretty straightforward combat system (except Xenosaga 2, but in a negative way), but what they did with the mecha battles in Gears and Xeno 3 was really good. And I hear you can manipulate time in Xenoblade. Final Fantasy XV's system looks rather impressive visually, and the teleportation seems fun. But I'm going to guess that X will be better in that department.

4. Will Innovate better Gameplay?

No clue.

5. Will Have the Better Story?

I trust Monolith more in this department than Square. So I'll say X.
Then again, FFXV has been in development for about 10 years, so it's hard to say. But when I see it, I get the FFXIII vibe from it.

6. Will Take Up Most of Gamers time? (Replay value+Longevity)

Without knowing what Xenoblade was like, I'll say the FF games tend to have more content.

7. Will Have The Better Enemy Designs? (pls note this isnt graphically, we all know FFXV wins [X1/PS4])

When it comes to monsters, no idea. When it comes to villains, X.

8. Will Have The Best SideQuest?

Can't recall many good side quests in the Xeno series, or the latest FF games for that matter. But in XIII-3 they're very good, because the whole game revolves around doing NPC side quests, like Majora's Mask. Soo I'll say FFXV here.

9.  Overall Better Game? FFXV/XCX.........

Xenoblade. (Unless FFXV also has the Majora's Mask/XIII-3 system.)

10. Will You Get Day 1?

Probably neither. But X is more likely than XV as a Day 1 purchase.

It's pretty easy to make a judgment at a glance. Monolith Soft is a B-tier developer. Square and Level 5 (referring to DQ) are really the only JRPG developers with enough time and money to put the time in to make whatever they want.

Yeah, but last generation, Monolith Soft did more with less than both of them. Monolith Soft has more than proved themselves equal and even superior to the competition.

It's pretty easy to make a judgment at a glance. Monolith Soft is a B-tier developer. Square and Level 5 (referring to DQ) are really the only JRPG developers with enough time and money to put the time in to make whatever they want.

Pokemon on the PS4/X1 would flop badly just like the previous Pokemon games on a Nintendo console ...

Pokémon Battle Revolution didn't feature any new Pokémon and was overall very mediocre. The game scored 53% on metacritic. It was lucky to still sell this much... You're really underestimating the power of Pokémon. 

Obviously the game would need better graphics, that's a very redundant thing to say. Besides, Pokémon has deeper mechanics, which you obviously don't seem to understand. Don't worry about it, neither do I... Try battling online, you'll get pummeled if you don't know how to breed the perfect Pokémon. 

And no, the combat still looks silly in most modern action RPGs. Collision detection was just one tiny example. Even when you make contact with a weapon, it doesn't look remotely realistic. 

They've made one great game ever, a couple of good games, and some meh games. Not sure how you can make that strecth unless you're giving them credit for all partnerships (Brawl, SRT, etc).

They fit right in with Tri-Ace, Namco, and From Software.

What? Thispart of your comment is all wrong bro? Previous Pokemon console games Flopped?

They are all spin off games and many actually have sold pretty well for just that. (Pokemon Stadium+2+Snap+etc).

There has never been 1 main series games on the Home Console, so your comment holds no water. 

Edit: pls dont count the spin off coliseum+Gale of Darkness as Main entrys cuz they are not (and weren't developed by GF)

Those spin-off's had the luxury of the Pokemon brand power ... 

I do realize that there hasn't been one mainline Pokemon game on a console but that doesn't nullify my point. Some of those console spin-offs actually had a lot of effort put into them yet it ended up been nothing but fruitless or a futile attempt ...