By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Sexism in Gaming

S.T.A.G.E. on 21 December 2014
DanneSandin said:
generic-user-1 said:

why should it effect your born abilities? its the other way around, your born abilities  effect your religiosity.

and if your neighbourhood is full of intolerant assholes its much easyer to change your believe.

So, what you're saying is that, the smarter you are from birth, the bigger the likelyhood that you will stop being religious? Tell that to Isaac Newton, among others. Thing is, it's not all that easy to "break up" with your religion, especially if you live in a very religios country.

Hmmm....are you religious?



Around the Network
generic-user-1 on 21 December 2014
DanneSandin said:
generic-user-1 said:
DanneSandin said:

Yes, but that doesn't effect your BORN ABILITIES. And it's not always that simple to break away from a religion where your entire neighborhood would turn their backs on you.

why should it effect your born abilities? its the other way around, your born abilities  effect your religiosity.

and if your neighbourhood is full of intolerant assholes its much easyer to change your believe.

So, what you're saying is that, the smarter you are from birth, the bigger the likelyhood that you will stop being religious? Tell that to Isaac Newton, among others. Thing is, it's not all that easy to "break up" with your religion, especially if you live in a very religios country.

you dont understand the meaning of your own writing... likelyhood!!!  i dont see the problem in newton beeing religious.

and yes, if you life in saudi arabia or the iran, you shouldnt break up fully, or they will burn you. 

i dont think we are so ot.  the feminazis(3rd wave feminism) and conservativ christians have the same moral issues and the same ihh tits...



S.T.A.G.E. on 21 December 2014
DanneSandin said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DanneSandin said:

But that's not what's being discussed here. I'm not surprised if men and women think differently, I'd be surprised however, if men were less intelligent than women, which is what G-U-1 is saying


As far as evolution is concerned men and women are wired to focus on other things and give me a chance to prove how sexism (when the term is used properly but in a reverse situation) can be used to prove this point.Women because of their evolutionary gathering heritage are considered superior to men at multitasking. Because of the fact that women are percieved as being superior at it if a man came a long who was up to the task (the standout of male applicants for a secretarial/clerical position) and was disciminated again (even by a male boss) it is still sexism because of favoritism for one sex over the other.

Hope this helped. Im going to sleep. 

Bolded: Two things are wrong with this statement; it's been proven that women are NOT better at multitasking than men, that's an old myth. And, what do you mean by "evolutionary gathering heritage"? As in, they evolved to gather food? Because, I can see plenty of things that's wrong with that statement as well.

And I don't think I disagree with your last part of that paragraph. Discrimination over gender, race, culture, religion or whatever is still discrimination. So I don't think I quite get what youre trying to get at?

Yet again I must prove to you what has been scientifically proven...come on bro, this has to stop.

It has been scientifically proven that women are better at multitasking than men. Men tend to be more one tracked than women.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24645100

When I say evolutionary gathering heritage, look up "hunters and gatherers". 



generic-user-1 on 21 December 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DanneSandin said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DanneSandin said:

But that's not what's being discussed here. I'm not surprised if men and women think differently, I'd be surprised however, if men were less intelligent than women, which is what G-U-1 is saying


As far as evolution is concerned men and women are wired to focus on other things and give me a chance to prove how sexism (when the term is used properly but in a reverse situation) can be used to prove this point.Women because of their evolutionary gathering heritage are considered superior to men at multitasking. Because of the fact that women are percieved as being superior at it if a man came a long who was up to the task (the standout of male applicants for a secretarial/clerical position) and was disciminated again (even by a male boss) it is still sexism because of favoritism for one sex over the other.

Hope this helped. Im going to sleep. 

Bolded: Two things are wrong with this statement; it's been proven that women are NOT better at multitasking than men, that's an old myth. And, what do you mean by "evolutionary gathering heritage"? As in, they evolved to gather food? Because, I can see plenty of things that's wrong with that statement as well.

And I don't think I disagree with your last part of that paragraph. Discrimination over gender, race, culture, religion or whatever is still discrimination. So I don't think I quite get what youre trying to get at?

Yet again I must prove to you what has been scientifically proven...come on bro, this has to stop.

It has been scientifically proven that women are better at multitasking than men. Men tend to be more one tracked than women.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24645100

When I say evolutionary gathering heritage, look up "hunters and gatherers". 


well he is right, that proves nothing, bbc isnt peer-reviewed---



DanneSandin on 21 December 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DanneSandin said:
generic-user-1 said:

why should it effect your born abilities? its the other way around, your born abilities  effect your religiosity.

and if your neighbourhood is full of intolerant assholes its much easyer to change your believe.

So, what you're saying is that, the smarter you are from birth, the bigger the likelyhood that you will stop being religious? Tell that to Isaac Newton, among others. Thing is, it's not all that easy to "break up" with your religion, especially if you live in a very religios country.

Hmmm....are you religious?

Lol! No :P Far from it



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Around the Network
RenCutypoison on 21 December 2014
CavemanCavan said:
You use Samus in defence against sexist behavior when you can get her in a bikini. I mean. Come on.

Look I'm no decrier of portrayal but you don't have to look far to the most popular titles to see there's a discrepancy.
Also, Peach called and says she's tired of being a Macguffin


Cause you can't get real women in bikini.



S.T.A.G.E. on 21 December 2014
generic-user-1 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DanneSandin said:

Bolded: Two things are wrong with this statement; it's been proven that women are NOT better at multitasking than men, that's an old myth. And, what do you mean by "evolutionary gathering heritage"? As in, they evolved to gather food? Because, I can see plenty of things that's wrong with that statement as well.

And I don't think I disagree with your last part of that paragraph. Discrimination over gender, race, culture, religion or whatever is still discrimination. So I don't think I quite get what youre trying to get at?

Yet again I must prove to you what has been scientifically proven...come on bro, this has to stop.

It has been scientifically proven that women are better at multitasking than men. Men tend to be more one tracked than women.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24645100

When I say evolutionary gathering heritage, look up "hunters and gatherers". 


well he is right, that proves nothing, bbc isnt peer-reviewed---


BBC reported on the study. Other outlets reported on the study as well. BBC didnt make the study.

Same topic three years earlier.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/7896385/Scientists-prove-that-women-are-better-at-multitasking-than-men.html



DanneSandin on 21 December 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Yet again I must prove to you what has been scientifically proven...come on bro, this has to stop.

It has been scientifically proven that women are better at multitasking than men. Men tend to be more one tracked than women.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24645100

When I say evolutionary gathering heritage, look up "hunters and gatherers". 

I can easily dig up articles that says that women are NOT better at multitasking, and even that MEN are better at it. So, the issue is still not proven.

Yeeeeaaaah, I know what hunter gatherer means, and I kinda thought you said what you were saying, but just wanted to make sure. There is nothing that suggest that women are better at picking bearies and roots than men, if that's what you're insinuating?



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

DanneSandin on 21 December 2014
generic-user-1 said:
DanneSandin said:
generic-user-1 said:
DanneSandin said:

Yes, but that doesn't effect your BORN ABILITIES. And it's not always that simple to break away from a religion where your entire neighborhood would turn their backs on you.

why should it effect your born abilities? its the other way around, your born abilities  effect your religiosity.

and if your neighbourhood is full of intolerant assholes its much easyer to change your believe.

So, what you're saying is that, the smarter you are from birth, the bigger the likelyhood that you will stop being religious? Tell that to Isaac Newton, among others. Thing is, it's not all that easy to "break up" with your religion, especially if you live in a very religios country.

you dont understand the meaning of your own writing... likelyhood!!!  i dont see the problem in newton beeing religious.

and yes, if you life in saudi arabia or the iran, you shouldnt break up fully, or they will burn you. 

i dont think we are so ot.  the feminazis(3rd wave feminism) and conservativ christians have the same moral issues and the same ihh tits...

You said (or at least I read it as such) that being smart means that you're more likely to stop being religious, and then I brough Newton in to this since he was VERY smart, but didn't stop being religious. I just don't think it's fair to say that religious people are more "genetically stupid" than others



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

S.T.A.G.E. on 21 December 2014
DanneSandin said:

I can easily dig up articles that says that women are NOT better at multitasking, and even that MEN are better at it. So, the issue is still not proven.

Yeeeeaaaah, I know what hunter gatherer means, and I kinda thought you said what you were saying, but just wanted to make sure. There is nothing that suggest that women are better at picking bearies and roots than men, if that's what you're insinuating?


Then please...dig. :)