I can picture it now:

"The Land of the Deaf - A dystopic society where social programs are abolished to invest in computer scince for the population's desperate need for more performance and frames"

Call me, Spielberg.

I have huge ears and 30/10 vision, so daddy needs his 60FPS.

I'll see it, so long as it insults North Korea or stars fat Haley Joel Osment.

I have probably the best hearing out of anybody I know. I can't tell the difference between 60 or 30, but I can tell the difference between below 30 and locked at 30.

I have very bad hearing and I don't have a preference. Personally, I think some games @ 60 look too glassy. Depends on the game though. My bad hearing isn't from birth though, it's because I go to too many punk shows.

I only care about 60 because of controller response time. Not the actual appearance I see. When a game goes in 30, I have a harder time responding to what I have to attack on screen. And I have very good hearing. So that's all junk.

30 and 60 FPS are both cool!

Interesting.
I think it is easy to test.
take a youtube video, see it 4 times.
one at 30 FPS with nomal audio,
other at 60 FPS with nomal audio,
other at 30 FPS and no audio,
and other at 60 FPS and no nomal audio.
Then give a grade (0 to 10) to the feeling for each video.

If everyone that posted here make this experience and post here, we can measure empirically this theory.

I say just play Transformers War For Cybertron on PC. The game is normally stuck at 30. Then use the fps unlocker to get it to 60. That shows a clear difference between the two.

Where is the I dont notice the difference between locked frame rates option? I have Dark Souls on my PC and they just updated it and nixed the 60 fps and I have to play at 30, no difference to me.