spurgeonryan said:
|
Monolith Soft is Nintendo. Calling this game second party is like calling Zelda second party. In fact it is calling Zelda second party.
spurgeonryan said:
|
Monolith Soft is Nintendo. Calling this game second party is like calling Zelda second party. In fact it is calling Zelda second party.
Clyde32 said: Monolith Soft is Nintendo. Calling this game second party is like calling Zelda second party. In fact it is calling Zelda second party. |
More like calling Metroid Prime or Pokemon second-party.
Ok, lets clear this up.
First party - anything done by Nintendo or any studios they own
Second party - Nintendo owns IP but NOT developer associated with it - sin and punishment as example.
Third party - IP and studio not owned.
We should know this stuff guys.
spurgeonryan said: |
Nintendo owns Monolith Soft. They're first party.
Second party is when a developer isn't owned, but they still receive funding and work under the console publisher. Insomniac Games, Bungie, Level 5, etc.
It's first party, Nintendo owns Monolith Soft, it's a Nintendo game. It will need a huge marketing push, but it maaaay be able to pull it off worldwide hopefully.
NintendoPie said:
Exactly, that's why I don't think it's possible. |
well I guess we will have to wait and see. I still think 700k will be a given 1st year
I think I should mention the game is first party.
Nobody else has done it yet.
the_dengle said:
More like calling Metroid Prime or Pokemon second-party. |
Or any metroid game really. I was making the point that if he separates Monolith, he may as well separate EAD 3 as well. But Metroid and Super Metroid were both made by Intelligent Systems, so it applies there as well.
at least one of lego city, zombi u, bayonetta 2 and hyrule warriors will become a million seller before. but xenoblade is first party anyway.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.