and how does that explain why the ps4 row attachrate is above the us and eu attachrate, while the xb1 row attchrate is way below the xb1 us and eu attachrate.
and what about xb360 and ps3? both console dont have ridicolous higher attachrates in row, than theire main markets
only the ps4 show this wrong picture.

do u want to tell me, that only casuals buy a ps3, xb360 and xb1, but hardcore high attachrate gamers only a ps4. and this weird situation only appear in the rest of world?

why do u guys start to defend vgc now. when they generally track always wrong?

Pretty sure vgc tracks with lot of mistakes. But you preffered to consider overtracking sw instead of undertracking HW and that says a lot about you even more when we get monthly evidence of undertracking of one almost none for the other (and for some sw we are certain of undertracking like tlou+TLOUR and gtv).

Because you preffer to consider this a case of SW on sony console doing worst than the tracked numbers instead of HW better than tracked... while also ignoring that they could be just split wrong. Besides that for HW the only method ioi uses on RoW is estimating consoles sales based on number of psn accounts... so SW is completely ass pulled probably.

u dont get it, huh?
It doesn't matter if hardware is undertracked and software would be right. the software tracking would still be broken and wrong.

if u went into a math class and calculate wrong, but luckily the result is the right one.
is ur math right or wrong in that case?

hardware sales are one part of the algorithm to make up the software sales.

on the bold part:
overall? on ps3? on ps4? what are u talking about? at least u could give number, so i have a vague clue
i just know tlou is undertracked on ps3 by certain. so if u make this bold statements and let them seem like a fact, give some fucking evidence, pls

Maybe those games are the ones the rest of the world is most interested in? Who are you to say that only 10% of the people who own a console can be interested in a game. I think you might want to leave that up to each individual consumer.

Do you think VGC have SW tracking relating to HW tracking? How do you explain Vita Borderland 2 had like 100k standalone sales of SW and 5k for the bundle when just the bundle were available?

Everything here is broken, we all get that, but your claim sounds like just trying to downplay PS, and that is because you are always downplaying it.

2 wrongs don't make a right in a dissertative question, but makes a right on a multi choice one.

Anyway we weren't talking about math, calculation or prediction, just your claim that PS4 SW is overtracked because some games attach rate is too big.

If you can prove that HW and SW is linked in this site tracking I can conced, but I doubt you can... have all the SW been adjusted up by the same % after each individual adjustments of HW? I don't think so. But please prove me wrong then I will accept that the only option is SW overtrack and not HW undertrack.

Gran Turism V were almost 1M undertracked at a time. As I said before your bolding HW we are certain to have undertracking for several cases, SW we didn't got consistent evidence of overtracking but got some of undertracking so I'm not sure why you are asking if it is overal, ps3, ps4, etc. The little evidence I saw for the PS3 games I cared they were undertracked. Of course Bayo2, DC and FH2 seem overtracked, but we still don't have data to confirm, but GTV had the publisher numbers quite outpacing VGC, same for TLOUR.

Looks undertracked to me.

I can never remember, does VGChartz try to guess digital sales as well as retail, or only retail?

Asking because there was a thread somewhere around here about how the PS4's software sales at retail had reached 50 million, if I remember correctly.  We could compare what we know about that announced figure to VGChartz's overall tracking on PS4 software; if nothing else, it would determine whether this is a case of general under tracking, or just some homeless numbers getting shunted over there because he doesn't know where to put them, but knows they sold somewhere. EDIT: Never mind about that, the thread is referencing VGChartz numbers. x3 Given all the details coming from that Investors thing that happened recently, I incorrectly thought it was another tidbit that had leaked from it.

And at some mentioned, given how nebulous the rest of world tracking is, there's also a chance that the hardware there is being undertracked, which would result in a higher attach rate.

Of course, This could just be a case of over tracking on the site's part, but your numbers aren't really confirming your conclusion outright. You just kind of seem to be picking your own interpretation and presenting it as fact. =P

PS4 software is most likely undertacked as usual. Just because the software allocations are wrong doesn't mean the overall numbers are undertracked. You found an inconsistency in VGChartz numbers tracking, congratulations are in effect because this never happens.

sure. just like xb1 sold 20m units already...

here is some other math i did that show why row ps4 software has to be overtracked based on watchdog as example  (from npd and pal charts we know that us and uk are at least some kind of accurate)

watchdogs sold just over 4m units in its first week  
watchdogs sold 10-12% of all units on pc
70% of pc sales for watchdog are digital
watchdogs sold about 10% of next gen digital
watchdogs sold 3-5% of last gen digital
watchdogs sold 2X on next gen compared to last gen
(this are all ubisoft own figures form the investor calling)
http://www.dsogaming.com/news/watch_dogs-pc-sales-10-12-next-gen-version-sold-2x-more-than-old-gen-version/

VGC retail numbers for first week:
1971k ps4
759k xb1
622,5k ps3
412,5k x360
113k pc retail

+ 273k next gen digital
+ 42k last gen digital
+ >300k pc digital

=  4.5m sales

here is how it should look:
~4.1m sales
~450k pc sales (315k digital, 135k retail)
~2500k next gen (250k digital, 2150k retail)
~1150k last gen (46k digital, 1106k retail)

2730k next gen retail only is overtracked. and with 300k less ps4 row sales and some other minor ajdustments it would fit at least the own ubisoft sales figures...

did i said that?
but if u state, that ps4 software is most likely undertracked would u be that kind and give a source, hint, math, or anything else than just a bland statement to prove that?
what kind of base is that to argue about something?