I would feel for bad for closing a thread that attacks the Wii, because that might be biased of me. Oh teh noes!
Well, I just locked a thread about "PS3 losing exclusives" so the fanboys have nothing to argue about.
The fact is, games that have been developed exclusively or with the Wii strongly in mind have done very well in sales. I don't know what gebx was trying to prove by showing us that Rayman and Sonic sold better on the Wii than on the PS3. The PS3 Sonic is crap, and Rayman was designed for the Wii in the first place. So of course they sold better. Red Steel sold well.
But do you acknowledge that? No. You show us Spiderman 3...the crappiest example of a 3rd party game save for FarCry.
The consensus seems to be that if 3rd parties build games from the ground up for the Wii, they have much better potential to sell well...the problem is people can't compare them to PS3 sales, and so they never acknowledge such games, like Red Steel.
This thread might not have been made to bait users into stupid fanboy arguments, but that's what it came out to be. I'm sick of all the "kiddy" attacks and pointless arguments about whether Wii Sports or Play is a legitimate game. I know plenty of people that own a Wii, but haven't bought hardly any games for it...that doesn't mean they don't play Wii Sports every day, or rent games when they come out. In fact, most of my friends have been renting, and buying the ones they loved like Super Paper Mario, Red Steel and SSX Blur.
This had potential to legitimately discuss how "casual" the Wii's audience really is...so come back next time with better information backing up your arguments and less fanboy twisting. You got a problem with that, take it up with me.
EDIT: I missed the post above me, and after thinking, I'll give this thread another chance. Maybe we could take into account ALL the numbers that apply? Not just the ones that suit our agenda, mm? Just know that I'm *this close to the Lock button.