bubblegamer said:
Not official ones. Or are we saying bundles don't matter much now? |
only when ps4 kicks xbox
”The environment where PlayStation wins is best for this industry” (Jack Tretton, 2009)


bubblegamer said:
Not official ones. Or are we saying bundles don't matter much now? |
only when ps4 kicks xbox
”The environment where PlayStation wins is best for this industry” (Jack Tretton, 2009)


| prinz_valium said:
at least in uk its true, that x360 user dont move to current gen (ps4 or x1) as fast as ps3 user |
Your charts and reasoning also doesn't account for the idea that some gamers simply elected not to buy the new iteration of those annual franchises.
Scientificreason said:
You'd have a point if UK was all earth and 360 never nearly doubled ps3 in the UK. It is a moronic argument. |
...you mentioned UK yourself in the post. And this is a UK thread.
|
jlmurph2 said:
|
Explained many times now... Some fames sell better on certain platforms despite install base. Cod also has Dlc first marketing and a bundle for x1 and it is not a huge gap in the UK. There is a reason final fantasy sold a lot more on ps3 despite 360 having a much bigger install base at the time.
jlmurph2 said:
...you mentioned UK yourself in the post. And this is a UK thread. |
I was talking overall... 360 nearly doubled ps3 in the UK.... It selling more software I hardly indicative of the bigger picture.
Scientificreason said:
Explained many times now... Some fames sell better on certain platforms despite install base. Cod also has Dlc first marketing and a bundle for x1 and it is not a huge gap in the UK. There is a reason final fantasy sold a lot more on ps3 despite 360 having a much bigger install base at the time. |
Don't compare the two because COD was always on both platforms. Final Fantasy coming to 360 was a situation of a franchise becoming multiplat. The only thing you can compare COD situation to is GTAV. Which sold more on the 360 in the US despite all the bundles and marketing.
Scientificreason said:
You'd have a point if UK was all earth and 360 never nearly doubled ps3 in the UK. It is a moronic argument. |
what? u really talk about moronic and have no clue about it? the only way to compare relative changes is % changes
and its cleary way bigger for the ps3
more % of ps3 user moved to next gen than % of 360 user (or to be correct. more % of ps3 user dont buy ps3 software anymore than x360 user)
or do u like to spin and prefer to use flat numbers? because thats how morons compare changes.
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
Scientificreason said:
|
9m and 6m is not "nearly doubled". Don't try that.
jlmurph2 said:
9m and 6m is not "nearly doubled". Don't try that. |
its acutally 9m vs 5.5
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=192775&page=1
prinz_valium said:
more % of ps3 user moved to next gen than % of 360 user (or to be correct. more % of ps3 user dont buy ps3 software anymore than x360 user) |
Quite the leap of logic... Ps3 sold less software in the UK, where it has a lower install base.... On no way proves they upgraded to next gen. We do now a good chunk of xbox gamers gave moved to ps4. You cannot assume from this more ps3 gamers upgraded. Ad for calling me a moron I'll let the mods handle it.
I am talking worldwide also, UK is pretty small overall.
I never said your argument was moronic, I was talking about yousef mehdis.