By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Can anyone say to me why nintendo shos us a grpahic and than they use another in ZELDA U??

Skidmore on 03 November 2014
curl-6 said:
Clyde32 said:
The one from 2011 was a Demo Ocarina of Time had one, Wind Waker had one and now Zelda U has one. Every time they get new hardware they show what they can do with Zelda.

And then follow up with a game that fails to utilise this potential. At least on the case of this and Wind Waker.


They did, it was called Twilight Princess, which was far superior to that Tech Demo... Tech Demo that wasn't even as impressive as WW..

 

Seriously curl?? Look at this thing again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEF9Utdu-L0



NNID: MagicalLight

FC: 4124 - 5888 - 4804

Around the Network
curl-6 on 03 November 2014
Skidmore said:
curl-6 said:
Clyde32 said:
The one from 2011 was a Demo Ocarina of Time had one, Wind Waker had one and now Zelda U has one. Every time they get new hardware they show what they can do with Zelda.

And then follow up with a game that fails to utilise this potential. At least on the case of this and Wind Waker.


They did, it was called Twilight Princess, which was far superior to that Tech Demo... Tech Demo that wasn't even as impressive as WW..

Twilight Princess was essentially an apology for Wind Waker, after the latter delivered something nobody ever asked for.



marley on 03 November 2014

I think they style of ZeldaU is much better than the tech demo...



Nem on 03 November 2014

I agree. I dont like it that they tease something and then dont deliver it.

With that said, Zelda U doesnt look bad, and if it follows through with beeing sandboxy, its a safrice i am willing to make.



HoloDust on 03 November 2014

Cause there's nothing more satisfying for Aonuma than to troll TP fans?



Around the Network
Deeds on 03 November 2014
curl-6 said:
sundin13 said:
curl-6 said:

Zelda U will be a fantastic game, of that I am confident. But in my assessment it was a commercial mistake not to go with the more marketable darker style of the tech demo.


Commercial mistake? Maybe, but I'll be damned if I don't respect/love the hell out of their decision.

Hey, don't get me wrong, I actually like the new style. Not as much as the epic tech demo style, but it's still very appealing.

Unfortunately, in today's market, many people will now skip it because it looks too "kiddy".

So Link should get a voice where he swears every 10 seconds, shoots a ak47 and throws grenades at moblins and have bood splatter everywhere? No thanks.



curl-6 on 03 November 2014
Deeds said:
curl-6 said:

Hey, don't get me wrong, I actually like the new style. Not as much as the epic tech demo style, but it's still very appealing.

Unfortunately, in today's market, many people will now skip it because it looks too "kiddy".

So Link should get a voice where he swears every 10 seconds, shoots a ak47 and throws grenades at moblins and have bood splatter everywhere? No thanks.

I must have missed that part of the 2011 Zelda tech demo, can you show it to me?



Gammalad on 03 November 2014

Different art style directions. Honestly when I first saw the trailer for Zelda U my eyes legit lit up and I almost shed a tear. I love the whimsical art style they are going for, and honestly I probably would not play through Zelda U if it was like Twilight Princess.



"I think it will be the HDS"-Me in regards to Nintendo's next handheld.

curl-6 on 03 November 2014
mZuzek said:
curl-6 said:

Twilight Princess was essentially an apology for Wind Waker, after the latter delivered something nobody ever asked for.

And it was still miles better than Twilight Princess ever hoped of being.

To be honest I'm really glad they didn't go for the realistic artstyle this time and in my opinion Zelda Wii U is easily the prettiest game I've seen so far. Yes, I'm talking every game ever there. Is it technically impressive? I don't know and couldn't care less, but it does look very beautiful. Also, in response to the OP, they never changed the graphics - it was always a tech demo and they even said several times that the real game could look nothing like that.

I'm just grateful we're not getting Ocarina of Time 3 (or Twilight Princess 2, whatever you might wanna name it) and instead they're making another unique, special Zelda like Majora's Mask, The Wind Waker and Skyward Sword were. It's especially refreshing when you consider that the latest game in the franchise has no personality either.

I wasn't talking about personal preference, I was talking about commercial appeal in the current market. 



Deeds on 03 November 2014
curl-6 said:
mZuzek said:

I wasn't talking about personal preference, I was talking about commercial appeal in the current market. 


You are posting non-sense. What commercial appeal are you talking about? Pokemon has commercial appeal and it has so-called "kiddy" graphics.