By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS4 vs XB1 Graphics Discrepancy Not As Big As Last Gen?

 

Which gen is the discrepancy greater

PS4 vs XB1 323 77.46%
 
PS3 vs 360 93 22.30%
 
Total:416
pokoko said:

Upset?  What are you talking about?  I don't see anything wrong or untrue about what I said and I see nothing to indicate being "upset".

Your first post had overtones like you were taking my post seriously (it was not intended as such) and took affront.



Around the Network

This pole, being as pathetically apocalyptic as it is, proves just whats so wrong with this gen's gamers more than the consoles themselves. And then they wonder why PC gamers make fun of them..



Erwin-VGC said:
CGI-Quality said:
Erwin-VGC said:
Ugh... last-gen was so unfair for Sony... some people were really thinking XB360 was more powerfull than PS3, lol.

Actually, it was very fair, and very much Sony's own fault. However, unlike this gen, the PS3 wasn't the weaker console. This time, the X1 trails because it truly is. If a game is identical across both platforms, the developer went for parity, which then makes technical specification comparisons useless.


What...? I'm just saying it is unfair that the more powerfull console got WORSE versions, what is "very fair" about that?

Power without perception/control is useless. And that s what sony probably took from last gen. There is no point having all the power in the world if no one can use it. As they say, you are only as strong as your weakest point.



CGI-Quality said:
Erwin-VGC said:
Ugh... last-gen was so unfair for Sony... some people were really thinking XB360 was more powerfull than PS3, lol.

Actually, it was very fair, and very much Sony's own fault. However, unlike this gen, the PS3 wasn't the weaker console. This time, the X1 trails because it truly is. If a game is identical across both platforms, the developer went for parity, which then makes technical specification comparisons useless.

Yeah, I agree.  A platform holder is responsible if they release a console that is significantly harder to develop games for than the competition.  I'm not saying the developers themselves are off the hook, as they are also responsible for anything that has their name on it, but in a world where games are made under deadlines, needless complexity in the development environment is asking for trouble.  Sony dug themselves into a hole at the start of last gen that developers had to climb their way out of.

That being said, that complexity became less of an issue as the generation matured.  Toward the end, we saw virtual parity, or games where one console would hold an edge in one area but lose in another, resulting in a wash.  That's why the XO/PS4 situation is different, as it's a hardware issue rather than an optimization issue.



You cant post 2 shots of a recent Xbox One and PS4 game that shows any difference. You need Digital Foundry to tell you whats different.



Around the Network

@CGI quality -- fair enough. However with those games with the exception of MGS GZ , those other games difference won't be noticeable on a 50 inch tv. However RDR , mafia and Bayonetta and skyrim on ps3 are noticeable without having df telling. Thats what i meant.



Vasto said:
You cant post 2 shots of a recent Xbox One and PS4 game that shows any difference. You need Digital Foundry to tell you whats different.


LMAO no...thee is a reason phones resolutions increase all the time...This is an idiotic response and false.... There is not a shred of truth to this at all, the better AA from better res alone is immediately noticeable, the better pixel density and res allows for more detail and smoother, sharper image period. 1080p >900P >720p, that is a technical fact.....STFU with the you cannot see it nonsense, it;s patehtic spin and makes you look like a moron.



dane007 said:
@CGI quality -- fair enough. However with those games with the exception of MGS GZ , those other games difference won't be noticeable on a 50 inch tv. However RDR , mafia and Bayonetta and skyrim on ps3 are noticeable without having df telling. Thats what i meant.


Again, a total lie to defend you rconsole. not to mention many x1 games had worse FPS, shadows, Ambient occlusions, lighting.



GumpStation said:
Vasto said:
You cant post 2 shots of a recent Xbox One and PS4 game that shows any difference. You need Digital Foundry to tell you whats different.


LMAO no...thee is a reason phones resolutions increase all the time...This is an idiotic response and false....

 

You dont understand what I am saying. Go find me any shots of recent games for PS4 and Xbox One that shows a visual difference in the pictures. I can clearly see in some of those shots the Xbox 360 version has better grass on the ground. Haters gonna hate.



Vasto said:
GumpStation said:
Vasto said:
You cant post 2 shots of a recent Xbox One and PS4 game that shows any difference. You need Digital Foundry to tell you whats different.


LMAO no...thee is a reason phones resolutions increase all the time...This is an idiotic response and false....

 

You dont understand what I am saying. Go find me any shots of recent games for PS4 and Xbox One that shows a visual difference in the pictures. I can clearly see in some of those shots the Xbox 360 version has better grass on the ground. Haters gonna hate.

Gamnes in motion not the same has decompressed screens, and yes even screens the detail is noticeable. I can clearly see the ps4 has better IQ then x1, digital foundry confirms this, the rest is desperate spin from a desperate pathetic fanbase.