Theres a pretty big difference between a 6/10 and a 2/10...

Plenty of games have fallen in score because of this site. I can choose to ignore it however the fact its marked under Metacritic hurts the games marketing. I have emailed Metacritic and reporting there reviews, I suggest anyone else that have issues with there reviews should do the same.

obvious clickbait is obvious

And fyo to everybody metacritic takes their review. Yup, metacritic scores are a clear indication of quality

http://gamepolitics.com/2014/09/29/tom-chick-cancer-relief-fund-generates-over-22k

Only knocked the score down a point (nice try, just goes to show how overwhelmingly positive the vast majority of other reviews were for it)), but the best thing to do is just report this BS.

So he's spending his time to play (in his opinion) shitty games?

I wouldn't have a problem with him giving those scores if the points he made held up, but if the rest are anything like the Halo 4 then they are pure nonsense. I remember him saying in the review 'if there's anything worse than more of the same, it's less of the same'. Put simply, he is basically saying 'every game sucks'.

Hardly surprising he gives everything a 2 or a 3.

right cuz a 2/10 is the same as giving a game a 6/10 plus this site gives everygame low scores

the site is nothing but a clickbate review site  they are always the lowest score for any game heck the gave tlou its lowest score

giving a game a 2/10 means its broken beyond repair. means that game is barely playable, looks like shit and has horrible presenation and a shitty as fuck story. even if halo 4 wasnt as good as the halos before it, its value productions alone would never let it be a 2. it makes no sense for it to be a 2. the site is utter shit and are whores for clicks.