By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Dragon Age 3: Inquisition Will Run at 1080p on PS4, 900p on Xbox One

kupomogli said:
Xeon said:
Take notes Ubi! "Maximized for the potential of each platform" is a good attitude to have. I bet this will lead to less debate than Ubisoft's comments about wanting less debate...

It's really not maximized for potential when the current gen versions graphics are being held back by the previous generation.  The graphics look good, but they don't really look exceptional.  They need to develop all five versions of the game so I'm pretty sure they haven't been really pushing the boundries on what the current gen and PC could due thanks to the games also releasing on last gen consoles.

Good point.  I totally forgot this was a last gen game as well.



Around the Network
TheAdjustmentBureau said:
ICStats said:
TheAdjustmentBureau said:

most importantly the point in making is

a, the power debate is internet point scoring

b, people choose the systems that has the games they want in the real world.


I don't agree that (a) is just point scoring.  It has a tangible "quality" value; it's just less important to you.

Point (b) is true, and nobody is going to dissuade you if you feel that Xbox has the exclusive games you want then that's fine.  Enjoy your XB1!  You don't have to justify your choice by downplaying the power difference.

I am happy with the game situation for PS4; as far as I'm concerned it has way more games than I have time to play.  I have over 12 retail games, a lot of digital games, and I'll add at least 12 more retail games in the next 6 months.

So the point is for me the "power argument" is multiplied manyfold because I enjoy many games, whereas the "exclusives" argument has less weight because "I could play Forza Horizon 2 instead of **** PS4 exclusive" is less important when you have tons to play anyway.



Well then people should buy pc multiplatform games as they are far superior to ps4 and Xbox one muliplats. Everyone I know chooses consoles based on exclusives. Some can't live without uncharted. Some can't live without halo or gears. A slight graphical difference has never been a choice. We aren't talking Wii to 360 level.difference here. We are talking ps2 vs Xbox difference in power.

Yeah exclusives are the main reason I'm a console gamer. God Of War is my second favourite franchise and it is the main reason I'm a PlayStation gamer (along with Uncharted and Gran Turismo) and was the reason I bought a PS3, PS Vita and now PS4 (in anticipation of God Of War IV). Otherwise I would have been a PC gamer.

However we have to also consider that many play on consoles for the online services, the trophies, or due to some multiplats being better on consoles, like Assassin's Creed.



TheAdjustmentBureau said:
ICStats said:
TheAdjustmentBureau said:

most importantly the point in making is

a, the power debate is internet point scoring

b, people choose the systems that has the games they want in the real world.


I don't agree that (a) is just point scoring.  It has a tangible "quality" value; it's just less important to you.

Point (b) is true, and nobody is going to dissuade you if you feel that Xbox has the exclusive games you want then that's fine.  Enjoy your XB1!  You don't have to justify your choice by downplaying the power difference.

I am happy with the game situation for PS4; as far as I'm concerned it has way more games than I have time to play.  I have over 12 retail games, a lot of digital games, and I'll add at least 12 more retail games in the next 6 months.

So the point is for me the "power argument" is multiplied manyfold because I enjoy many games, whereas the "exclusives" argument has less weight because "I could play Forza Horizon 2 instead of **** PS4 exclusive" is less important when you have tons to play anyway.



Well then people should buy pc multiplatform games as they are far superior to ps4 and Xbox one muliplats. Everyone I know chooses consoles based on exclusives. Some can't live without uncharted. Some can't live without halo or gears. A slight graphical difference has never been a choice. We aren't talking Wii to 360 level.difference here. We are talking ps2 vs Xbox difference in power.


The difference between Xbox and PS2 was very slight compared to between Wii and the Xbox 360,



Hynad said:
TheAdjustmentBureau said:
ICStats said:
TheAdjustmentBureau said:

most importantly the point in making is

a, the power debate is internet point scoring

b, people choose the systems that has the games they want in the real world.


I don't agree that (a) is just point scoring.  It has a tangible "quality" value; it's just less important to you.

Point (b) is true, and nobody is going to dissuade you if you feel that Xbox has the exclusive games you want then that's fine.  Enjoy your XB1!  You don't have to justify your choice by downplaying the power difference.

I am happy with the game situation for PS4; as far as I'm concerned it has way more games than I have time to play.  I have over 12 retail games, a lot of digital games, and I'll add at least 12 more retail games in the next 6 months.

So the point is for me the "power argument" is multiplied manyfold because I enjoy many games, whereas the "exclusives" argument has less weight because "I could play Forza Horizon 2 instead of **** PS4 exclusive" is less important when you have tons to play anyway.



Well then people should buy pc multiplatform games as they are far superior to ps4 and Xbox one muliplats. Everyone I know chooses consoles based on exclusives. Some can't live without uncharted. Some can't live without halo or gears. A slight graphical difference has never been a choice. We aren't talking Wii to 360 level.difference here. We are talking ps2 vs Xbox difference in power.


The difference between Xbox and PS2 was very slight compared to between Wii and the Xbox 360,


I know. That's the point.ps2 to Xbox was 45% difference in theoretical flops. Xbox one to ps4 is around the same. So like then the end result is moot.

 

I said Xbox one to ps4 isn't like Wii to 360.IIf gamers care for best multiplatform graphicstthen ps4 or Xbox one is not the choice. pc is. as I said console gamers choose for exclusives not a few extra pixels.

 

 



TheAdjustmentBureau said:
Hynad said:
TheAdjustmentBureau said:

Well then people should buy pc multiplatform games as they are far superior to ps4 and Xbox one muliplats. Everyone I know chooses consoles based on exclusives. Some can't live without uncharted. Some can't live without halo or gears. A slight graphical difference has never been a choice. We aren't talking Wii to 360 level.difference here. We are talking ps2 vs Xbox difference in power.


The difference between Xbox and PS2 was very slight compared to between Wii and the Xbox 360,


I know. That's the point.ps2 to Xbox was 45% difference in theoretical flops. Xbox one to ps4 is around the same. So like then the end result is moot.

 

I said Xbox one to ps4 isn't like Wii to 360.IIf gamers care for best multiplatform graphicstthen ps4 or Xbox one is not the choice. pc is. as I said console gamers choose for exclusives not a few extra pixels.

 

 

In both cases, the difference between consoles was still obvious. The gap between the Wii and the 360 is simply much bigger.



Around the Network
Hynad said:
TheAdjustmentBureau said:
Hynad said:
TheAdjustmentBureau said:

Well then people should buy pc multiplatform games as they are far superior to ps4 and Xbox one muliplats. Everyone I know chooses consoles based on exclusives. Some can't live without uncharted. Some can't live without halo or gears. A slight graphical difference has never been a choice. We aren't talking Wii to 360 level.difference here. We are talking ps2 vs Xbox difference in power.


The difference between Xbox and PS2 was very slight compared to between Wii and the Xbox 360,


I know. That's the point.ps2 to Xbox was 45% difference in theoretical flops. Xbox one to ps4 is around the same. So like then the end result is moot.

 

I said Xbox one to ps4 isn't like Wii to 360.IIf gamers care for best multiplatform graphicstthen ps4 or Xbox one is not the choice. pc is. as I said console gamers choose for exclusives not a few extra pixels.

 

 

In both cases, the difference between consoles was still obvious. The gap between the Wii and the 360 is simply much bigger.


Yeah I agree. But the ps2 held up well in the end. With games like ico and god of war 2. Sure it couldn't do half life 2 or halo without serious cuts to scale, but Xbox one will be the same. It will do fine. Games like horizon 2, Ryse show in the first year games look awesome. And quantum break looked phenominal and is apparantly claimed to be 1080p.

 

Sure ps4 will have some extra effects or a few extra pixels. But it won't matter. There's a reason Microsoft are trying so hard with first party. Halo 5 will look amazing, as will gears 4. People who loved gears and halo will without question buy Xbox one. If rare do banjo and conker right then Xbox may find new buyers from old school minty fans. Xbox one is 10 times more powerful than 360 was. Looking at halo 4 that's awesome. Games will look great as time goes on.



ICStats said:

That's fair.  I am a usually a 3 console gamer, and for now I'm waiting for XB1 to get some more exclusives first, especially something like Gears of War.

It's not that it doesn't have some great games.  I would play Forza Horizon, Killer Instinct and others, but there are also a lot of great multiplats which are on PS4 as well. and getting an XB1 with XBL and some games is still over $500 investment for it's current exclusives, since I wouldn't buy multiplats for it.

I wonder what size demographic you represent on a market percentage basis. I'm tempted to make a poll.

It seemed like last gen, there was a fair amount of 2 console owners on VGC and a smaller percentage of 3 console owners with a mix of console plus PC players.

I'll say that the main reason to buy multiple consoles of a given generation is for the platform exclusives, followed by being able to play the best version of multiplatform games and then choosing who one wishes to play with online since not everyone is on multiple services/platforms.

I bought all three fairly early in the 7th gen and the growth of Steam made that my fourth platform, but I found myself mainly playing on one platform later in the generation since I can only play so many games per month. The other consoles were only used for exclusives by then. Not really worth it unless one plays over 20 hours a week. 

I started with the PS4 with the intention of picking up a Wii U once the library filled in and a new Zelda and Metroid were released but now I'm not even sure I'll buy one at all if that happens 3-4 years into the product cycle. Not terribly interested in digging through the back catalog for more value since I already have a back catalog on the PS4 less than a year into release. 

Currently, there isn't anything on the XBO that would make me buy one and re-subscribe to XBL. Gears and Halo are the only exclusive franchises left on XB that I'm interested in and I see no point in playing any multiplatform games on the XBO. Not much value in buying a $500 console and subscribing to a service for only a few games since the number of hours it would be used would be pretty minimal unless the XBO became my new TV box. 



The whole resolution gate thing with the x1 and ps4 to me is completely stupid. Nevertheless, you know that you messed up big time when even people that should be happy (Xbox fans) see through the stupid.

Seriously, even xbox fans recognize that what the x1 can do at 900p, the ps4 can at 1080p. People aren't that fanatic about their console that they'll accept perfect parity, Ubisoft.



I <3 Classic Platformers!

Multi-console Owner FTW

TheAdjustmentBureau said:

Well then people should buy pc multiplatform games as they are far superior to ps4 and Xbox one muliplats. Everyone I know chooses consoles based on exclusives. Some can't live without uncharted. Some can't live without halo or gears. A slight graphical difference has never been a choice. We aren't talking Wii to 360 level.difference here. We are talking ps2 vs Xbox difference in power.

Nah, I prefer consoles.  I have a gaming PC but I don't use it in my livingroom on my big TV, so I very rarely buy games for PC on the argument of better graphics.   Generally on PC I play games that are PC only.

I don't think everyone cares about exclusives that much.  Sure core gamers often do, for example I care about exclusives on all 3 that's why I usually get all 3, but the majority of people who buy consoles play COD, GTA, FIFA and other multiplats.

For example, Halo 3 has ~14% attach rate on XB360.  Gears & Uncharted games have below 10% attach rates on their console.  So, sure there are lots of people who can't live without Halo/Gears/Uncharted but they're actually a minority among console gamers.  Only 4 out of the top 20 selling games on PS3 are 1st party.



My 8th gen collection

::looks at Ubisoft::

Trying to avoid debates you say?