By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - The Mod Team: Questions, Comments, Concerns? Ask Here!

padib said:
Carl2291 said:
I'll reply to you in more detail when I finish work.

A lot of posts in the thread we're borderline and not major. You reported what, 4 people? We agreed that they weren't really serious enough for moderation when the OP was so blatantly trying to cause trouble.

@work. No problem Carl.

@my reports (read when you're free).

I reported 3. In detail if memory serves me right:

These as personal attacks

Abbaththegrim: I bet you will make a thread like this if Nintendo makes another remaster.

Alternine: Thats bias for ya

And then this as off-topic

bloodtears: Not sure why we needed another thread on this topic, couldn't you just add your comment/thoughts to the original thread? Hope this one gets locked. 

 

Was I wrong on either account? How does OP lead to these kinds of post, I'm missing a link in the chain of reasoning.

Wasnt involved in the decision but the bloodtears post is not something id moderate for in this context.

The other two I agree are digs taken at the OP, however Carl does make reference to this when he locked the thread:

"For what its worth, the people who bit at the OP will not be moderated. Consider this a chance."

Under normal circumstances those posts from Abbath and Alternine would be moderated. So i dont see any issue with the reports, you were not wrong to report. I dont think anyone is saying you were wrong to report.

That being said i think Carl handled the situation well, locked the thread, banned a user who was clearly baiting, and made the call to not ban those who took the bait. As carl said "A lot of posts in the thread we're borderline and not major."

As for this "How does OP lead to these kinds of post, I'm missing a link in the chain of reasoning."

I will repost the ban note here, which i thought does a good enough job at explaining the reasoning behind the decision. If you disagree thats another thing, but i think Carl's viewpoint is well explained and backed up. Thats not to say you are wrong, perhaps RubberWhistle genuinely wanted to discuss the topic again, however all evidence suggests otherwise.

"Trolling (You have a long history of trolling Sony, Sony fans, PlayStation... You get where I'm going here. This is one more step on the ladder it seems. The fact that you even expected to get banned for it speaks volumes. However along with the obvious problems you knew this thread would cause, you outright lie about knowing about similar threads already created - http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7333464 - With a quick look at your recent posts, I can see several posts of yours in similar threads. This thread was created to stir trouble. You succeeded.) - M, Carl"



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Smeags said:

The thing is, the forums are here to encourage debate. And the more diverse the debates, the healthier this forum is.

That's what we ultimately want, a forum full of diverse and unique posters with diverse and unique viewpoints. And when they come together they create discussion that is confident and positive in how that user brings their viewpoint.

And yes, a dissenting or even "negative" viewpoint can be a positive contribution to the discussion. So in that case, we'll do what we can to encourage this sort of discussion, and that means a few things:

1. We'll continue to crack down, as have we always cracked down on, those who only wish to generalize and demean users or groups of users. If they're only there for console war glory, then we'll do what we can to make sure they either adapt to our rules, or no longer post here.

2. On the other side, we need our core posters to be confident and positive when they post. There's been an unfortunate rise of "Woe is me!" style posting going around recently, and all that does is derail and undermine healthy discussion. There has been too many instances of users, when faced with an opinion they don't agree with, bemoan these opinions instead of actually debating and adding their own thoughts and differing opinions on the matter. The thread then turns into a "No! My fanbase is more persecuted!" or a "Well your fanbase does this!" face-off that flushes any hope of decent conversation down the toilet. I'm not saying you do this, as you do a good job of voicing and expanding your viewpoints, but this persecution complex is spreading, across all fanbases and groups, and all it does it harm our forums.

3. We're not going to protect or target any "fanbase" or group over another (In fact I'd prefer it if folks saw themselves as individuals instead of a part of a company, but that's another matter). We're going to continue applying our rules to those whom we see breaking the rules. All we ask is that users, instead of bemoaning their situations, instead come out and discuss the issue confidently, so that discussion thrives and has a chance to move forward. And if they see a user who they believe is breaking the rules, then report them and either move on or try to steer their posts towards something more positive by presenting evidence and backed up viewpoints.

The only way this works is if users put in the work to make positive and constructive posts. We will try to slowly improve the culture of this site, but this is a community issue, and the community needs to put forth the effort to make the most change.

Nice speech, Smeags, but this just brings us back to square one. An issue was raised, a specific example was mentioned, the mod team gives a general answer while ignoring the specific example. The evidence that nobody in the mod team can be bothered to touch the specific example is pretty solid. Previously I posted this link:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7313045

That post can be interpreted as a mockery of the mod team (yes, I am being mean here) and the longer you ignore it, the worse it looks. When the specific example we are talking about is a thread with the message "Nintendo fans are pretty bad", an OP who can't be bothered to meet the rules for proper thread creation and then proceeds to tell people off because they have nothing to contribute, how can you as a mod sit there and act like that thread was acceptable at any stage? The best case scenario for the mod team here is that they didn't take padib's inquiry seriously, and that that is a consequence of being seriously understaffed at the moment as there simply wasn't enough time to give the issue the necessary attention.

I get that the community has to do its own part. I perfectly understand this. But if blatantly bad threads are allowed to exist, then the mod team can't push the responsibility for better discussion onto the community. What we are talking about here is a situation where the mod team had to step in in one form or another, but failed to do anything. Seriously, click on the link above and then check out the original post of that thread. I don't ask the mod team to read the entire thread anymore, because you should be able to guess the tone of the "discussion" based on the two aformentioned sample posts. It wasn't a thread that turned into "Your fanbase does this!" because that is what the entirety of the topic was already to begin with.

My reply was meant to be a "general reply". I saw multiple posts discussing stealth trolling so i gave my view on it.

I didnt reply to the specific example padib posted because i have no clue which moderator dealt with those reports or what the reasoning was behind any of the decisions taken. Me posting my personal view on a situation that was already dealt with, just creates confusion and sends a mixed message. My availability has also been bad this past week, so i didnt have time to bring this up in mod chat.

I watched the video posted in the thread, and personally i would not have moderated for the content of the video alone. The thread was also named after the video. I also disagree that the video was simply a "Nintendo fans are pretty bad" video. It was 30 minutes long discussed mulitple points and was focused around the project cars situation. Which was quite a big discussion point on here a few days back if i remember correctly.

What I would have looked at more closely was the thread creator, his history, conduct in the thread as well as the OP (which was pretty poor to say the least) and made a decision based on that. I definitely would have asked the thread creator to expand on his view in the OP to guide the discussion down a more constructive path. That being said the topic is centered around fans, so the resultant discussion might not have been avoidable.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

padib said:


Also Padib, just a reminder about the rules of this thread (this goes for me as well! :P):

  • In the same way, if you have an issue with a moderation issued to another user, the best, most efficient way to get a complete answer is to ask the moderator who issued said ban. Again, it is highly recommended that you PM the moderator in question for the quickest answer.
  • This is not the place to ask for moderation on another user. Report said user's potentially moderatable post/thread and let the Mod team handle it from there on out.
  • This is not the place to ask why your report did not result in a moderation for a user. Be respectful of the process and trust that every report is carefully examined before it is either dismissed or acted upon.

Perhaps it would be better if this discussion gets taken to PM. There is a reason why we have these rules in place, and i dont want to go against that or set the wrong precedant. We actually give a lot of leeway with this, but considering that we are dicussing particular users at this point I think it would be best to do this in private. To be fair to those users we are discussing, as well as to other members of the community who actually do follow these rules.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

I just wanted to tell Shinobi-san that I am impressed with what he has been doing around here and that I first hand know how difficult a job moderating can be.

Also, I would like to tell Carl that he is doing a horrible job as usual.



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

amp316 said:

I just wanted to tell Shinobi-san that I am impressed with what he has been doing around here and that I first hand know how difficult a job moderating can be.

Also, I would like to tell Carl that he is doing a horrible job as usual.

Thanks amp316 means a lot :)



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Around the Network

I wonder why I never had any problems with the mod team during my 8 years here; they sound horrible if this thread is anything to go by!



RolStoppable said:
Shinobi-san said:

My reply was meant to be a "general reply". I saw multiple posts discussing stealth trolling so i gave my view on it.

I didnt reply to the specific example padib posted because i have no clue which moderator dealt with those reports or what the reasoning was behind any of the decisions taken. Me posting my personal view on a situation that was already dealt with, just creates confusion and sends a mixed message. My availability has also been bad this past week, so i didnt have time to bring this up in mod chat.

I watched the video posted in the thread, and personally i would not have moderated for the content of the video alone. The thread was also named after the video. I also disagree that the video was simply a "Nintendo fans are pretty bad" video. It was 30 minutes long discussed mulitple points and was focused around the project cars situation. Which was quite a big discussion point on here a few days back if i remember correctly.

What I would have looked at more closely was the thread creator, his history, conduct in the thread as well as the OP (which was pretty poor to say the least) and made a decision based on that. I definitely would have asked the thread creator to expand on his view in the OP to guide the discussion down a more constructive path. That being said the topic is centered around fans, so the resultant discussion might not have been avoidable.

I didn't watch the video, I just trust people that I deem trustworthy when it comes to the content of the video. But it really doesn't matter what the video was because virtually nobody watched it, and as such the discussion was about the little information that was there. Put the title and the OP together, and the resulting context is "Nintendo fans are pretty bad" which is not acceptable.

But the most important point here is (or was) that the mod team owed padib an explanation. That that thread was allowed to exist in such a form hasn't so much to do with incompetence of the mod team as it has with lack of availability at just the wrong time. This past week I had to report a clear example of a thread that deserved to be locked twice until it actually happened.

If Padib reported the thread and the thread was not locked or moderated, then it means that a moderator or group of moderators purposefully made the decision to leave it open. So i dont think the issue is with availability here its actually with the decision taken by the mods.

In my above post I gave my opinion on the thread and how i would have most likely dealt with it. Given that the thread is targetted at one particular fanbase id ask the author to add more to the contents of his OP to make it less about Nintendo fans only. Id also monitor the thread and try nd keep it on track should we as a team of mods decided to leave it open. I might have also argued for a lock given the users history and the nature of the topic.

Also i dont think anyone is owed an explanation in this thread. Padib's query started out as a general topic around stealth trolling which a few mods responded to with a general reply. However now we are discussing a particular thread, and why it has been left open and not locked, moderated or edited etc.

I'll refer back to the rules of this thread:

  • This is not the place to ask why your report did not result in a moderation for a user. Be respectful of the process and trust that every report is carefully examined before it is either dismissed or acted upon.

In any case ive raised it in the mod chat. Other than that I'd suggest a pm to one of the head mods if either you or Padib want to take this further.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

RolStoppable said:
Shinobi-san said:

If Padib reported the thread and the thread was not locked or moderated, then it means that a moderator or group of moderators purposefully made the decision to leave it open. So i dont think the issue is with availability here its actually with the decision taken by the mods.

In my above post I gave my opinion on the thread and how i would have most likely dealt with it. Given that the thread is targetted at one particular fanbase id ask the author to add more to the contents of his OP to make it less about Nintendo fans only. Id also monitor the thread and try nd keep it on track should we as a team of mods decided to leave it open. I might have also argued for a lock given the users history and the nature of the topic.

Also i dont think anyone is owed an explanation in this thread. Padib's query started out as a general topic around stealth trolling which a few mods responded to with a general reply. However now we are discussing a particular thread, and why it has been left open and not locked, moderated or edited etc.

I'll refer back to the rules of this thread:

  • This is not the place to ask why your report did not result in a moderation for a user. Be respectful of the process and trust that every report is carefully examined before it is either dismissed or acted upon.

In any case ive raised it in the mod chat. Other than that I'd suggest a pm to one of the head mods if either you or Padib want to take this further.

Okay... it feels a bit weird that you didn't hesitate to throw the rest of the mod team under the bus.

I'm sure they will be just fine :)



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Right, Im home.

RubberWhistleHistle has a long history of trouble causing, aimed primarily at Sony and Sony fans. Immediately seeing his name above that thread leads me to think trouble is brewing. Its later in the thread where it becomes clear, when RWH says he has not seen other threads about the subject of Sony's Remasters. Look again at his OP, where he says it needs to be "re-brought up". He fully acknowledges that it has been discussed before, yet wants to open it up again. Seeing that he has also posted in other threads about Sony remasters, it all adds up.

We really, really didnt need another thread on it. Especially one that is built on ignorance, 1 week away from E3.

With a history like his, creating another thread about Sony Remasters while knowing it is a touchy subject thats been discussed to death already? To use a fairly recent example, its very similar to what toastboy used to do with Nintendo. There comes a point where it is easy to see through the disguise and see the real intent behind what the user is doing.

Furthermore, when he got called out on his ignorance he decided to get aggressive with people, which in fairness should have been added to his moderation and was a mistake on my part on the night.

Like Shinobi said, under normal circumstances the people just shoving "Nintendo!" at him would have been moderated for it. However I view this as something similar to the toastboy situation, meaning I will sure as hell give people one more life if they fall for the bait. Since Ive been on this team Ive kept the same stance that its unfair to moderate people who fall for flamebait, because that just means the bad guy gets what he wants. Two of us were looking over the thread at the time and both of us agreed on it.



                            

*edit* Whoops I posted in the wrong thread that was meant for PS Nation haha sorry. THese long work hours are getting to me. For those wondering I posted a tweet and an E3 pic here by accident



#1 Amb-ass-ador