i love how you ignore the alast of us remastered and the possibility of lbp3 reviewing well. 

and comparing H2 to driveclub just says it all. Imagine I reviewed metro last light and was like "it feels bland after playing gta 5, no drive by shooting, no heli's, no hip hop". It's embarressing reviewers are comparing an open world racer to a normal racer. I reckon the reason is because they are rival exclusives. #sad

when i was in school a 75 was a B. That was good and likewise with a game it was good. 

Not in reply to you: 

The playstation universe 95/100 and gamespot 50/100 are both shameful reviews. The game is clearly neither. 

Metacritic must die.

People go too over the top with this agregation sites. They shoudn´t.

That is a problem that the industry brought upon themselves in the late days of 6th genaration and the inception of internet.

The target public lacks maturity to deal with the contradictory opinions and different points of view.

This is was make any score below 8 is bad and only 90+ titles are worth praise.

So prior to FH2's release, every single X1 exclusive, bar 1, was average?

Well alrighty then ^^

Game is good and fun and its 49$ no taxes, unlike the other new games that goes for 69+taxes. I think for the price its well worth it. The cars handles very well and the graphics are awesome, more features to come. Feels like PGR with more features.

Luckily the general public doesn't follow Metacritic.

I tell people at work all the time that a game averaged "X" on Metacritic and everytime the response is "What the hell is Metacritic?"

Titanfall has 86. The only retail games to beat the tip 2 Xbox exclusives is a last gen gory remaster of the last of us. Which is worrying.

Soulless and mindless. Nothing else to see here.

How exactly do you judge a game's soul and mind?