By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Dev Facing Problems In CoD: Advanced Warfare XOne Development, Another Resolution-gate Controversy?

alabtrosMyster on 23 September 2014
Blood_Tears said:

 

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is still more than a month away from official launch, so there is enough development time left, and we expect Microsoft to go all gun blazing to make it look as close as possible with PlayStation 4 version. In the past, Microsoft helped developers achieve parity between PS4 and Xbox One version of Diablo III and Destiny.


That last paragraph is funny, if the game is shipping in a month (I am no CoD fan) then, it means it should be in Gold Master by now and no further changes are to be expected...

I think 900p ir something like that on the XB1 and 1080p on the PS4 are to expect for the more demanding titles.. MS engineers or no.

Now Tidux was banned from Neogaf because of the sheer amount of BS he uttered, so either way, he it not to be taken seriously, the game may well be 792p on xb1 and 900p on PS4... or the PS4 version could very well be scarificed for "parity" (and MS backroom deals).



Around the Network
Proxy-Pie on 23 September 2014

What does "gate" even mean?



Dark_Feanor on 23 September 2014
MohammadBadir said:
What does "gate" even mean?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scandals_with_%22-gate%22_suffix

http://public.oed.com/aspects-of-english/english-in-use/the-gate-suffix/

In 1972 the United States was transfixed by the revelation that the burglary at the national headquarters of the Democratic Party was connected with Richard Nixon’s Republican government. The burglary took place in the Watergate building, Washington DC, and thus, by metonymy, the scandal itself became known by the name of Watergate. One of the most significant episodes in modern US politics, Watergate has since reshaped the language of scandal and controversy in a format that also extends beyond English-speaking commentaries.



Proxy-Pie on 23 September 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
MohammadBadir said:
What does "gate" even mean?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scandals_with_%22-gate%22_suffix

http://public.oed.com/aspects-of-english/english-in-use/the-gate-suffix/

In 1972 the United States was transfixed by the revelation that the burglary at the national headquarters of the Democratic Party was connected with Richard Nixon’s Republican government. The burglary took place in the Watergate building, Washington DC, and thus, by metonymy, the scandal itself became known by the name of Watergate. One of the most significant episodes in modern US politics, Watergate has since reshaped the language of scandal and controversy in a format that also extends beyond English-speaking commentaries.

Interesting.

Thanks for the info!



LiquorandGunFun on 23 September 2014

4k for ps4 confirmed.

that would melt the internet...



 

Around the Network
Aura7541 on 23 September 2014

I'm skeptical of any insider unless it's Shinobi. However, Digital Foundry determined the X1 COD: AW trailer to be 1568 x 882. We're likely going to be seeing 900p on the X1 and 1080p on the PS4. As for framerate, we shall see...

Source: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-resolution-boosted-for-call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-on-xbox-one



ethomaz on 23 September 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
"as compared to glorious 1080p on PS4."

I don´t think anyone with no bias would call that game visuals "glorious".

And oh!! The flash back.

That is the same story as last year, We only have a different insider, that could not be wrong whether the game is 720/900/1080p he covered all possibilits.

I can´t stop think these king of campain are organised. They can´t just let it go and let people decide when they see the final game.

Did you played Ghosts on both? This word is not poinless in this case... it is a big difference in IQ.



Blood_Tears on 23 September 2014
walsufnir said:
there are sites that still believe in tidux and worse, there are still people who create threads which are based on these sites. tales from my ass, sorry. it's almost like insiderp.


No worries, I’m sure come release date you’ll have your own thread on the matter where you selectively bold words and phrases to downplay the superior version. Till then I guess you’re going to have to deal with rumors..



Aura7541 on 23 September 2014

If neither MS nor Sledgehammer come out and say, "COD: AW X1 is 1080p", then it's safe to say that we're going to be seeing a 900p resolution.



globalisateur on 23 September 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
globalisateur said:


There was only resolution parity, no performance parity. The XB1 versions at 1080p had performance issues: ~50fps for diablo 3 and frame-pacing issues (judder) for Destiny.

The XB1 version of CODAW, at ~864p, was already running at ~40fps regularly in the last gameplay video they showed us.

WOW!!!

That is what I call delusional:

"However, the Xbox One version still suffers from similar frame-pacing issues originally encountered in the beta. Microsoft's hardware averages at a 30fps output but the ordering of its frames is uneven, causing certain stages to feel less smooth as a result. The Dark Beyond mission, for example, has single frames dropped and added while enemies swarm out of a temple in our tests, causing a jittering sensation, while PS4 remains entirely consistent with a 33ms render-time per frame."

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-destiny-face-off

"It isn't quite a faultless display from the PS4 version, but close; in our full playthrough, the auto-save causes the odd a hiccup, as does occasionally streaming in new segments of a just-loaded area. However this stands at odds with the prolonged stretches of 50-60fps play possible on Xbox One. Given no issues were recorded during our earlier, pre-patch 900p tests, it's logical to assume this is a GPU-side strain, perhaps where alpha transparency effects are pushing Microsoft's console to these lurches.

But is this performance a deal-breaker for Xbox One? Given how infrequently we bumped into the issue, even during frenzied sand dune battles with two allied AI players in tow, the issue is surprisingly rare. Most drops tend to be imperceptible, and in the end, we resorted to scanning hours of footage to track most shifts downwards from the 60fps mark. A screen filled with effects-spewing creatures isn't necessarily the ticket to a frame-rate drop - even at its extremes the Xbox One holds up well save for a few choice moments."

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-diablo-3-ultimate-evil-face-off

Both game are as iqual as it can be.

But if you realy want to stik to randon blink of an eye performance hickups... be free.

Except for the performance, worse on XB1 on both games. Whatever how you want to spin it. 

Some levels in Diablo 3 runs at ~50fps constantly, locked 60fps on PS4 on the same levels.

Many levels suffers from constant frame pacing issue resulting in constant judder on Destiny on XB1. There are 2 hiccups noted by DF on the whole PS4 game, a streaming hiccup, the same as on XB1, one one frame pacing issue they noticed on PS4. One. But DF insisted on those 2 unique hiccup on the PS4 game because they couldn't say the PS4 was perfect, but it is, near-perfect as they said when it constantly stutters on some levels on XB1, less on others.

Don't let you confuse by DF wording and the insistence they have on talking about One hiccup on PS4, as if, XB1 games and PS4 had similar performance, they don't.

Remember when DF talked about the deal breaker frame pacing issue of the PS4 beta? As if it was unbearable? Apparently constant frame pacing issue is only unbearable on Playstation machines, not Xbox like here with DEstiny XB1 which is "not a deal breaker" for DF.