Hand of Suspicion - it's really just a symbolic thing, one level up from Finger of Suspicion.

Radish - I dont like his lack of worthwhile play throughout the entire Day 1. Conegamer-like reads.

theprof00 - As I said during Day 1, I thought a lot of his play was stupid. Slips (Not knowing Terran = Town), inconsistencies/ contradictions. Honestly though, his arguments regarding Wrights PM screw up had me leaning Town rather than Scum after our coming together. Not 100% sure what to think of him, 50/50.

I also dont like how all of a sudden he seems to have dropped his "case" on me for no specific reason (unless I missed it?) despite him being 100% sure I was Scum during Day 1. That seems very, very unlike prof, who has a reputation for constantly going at people he suspects or people who go after him. Straight from the horses mouth.

padib... Slight scum reads. I need to go look through his posts one more time though. I didnt like the whole "This is a WoW game!" thing, trying to distract from what I see as a clear 3/4 faction game (Hiding his Zerg faction?). The last paragraph of this post implies he wasnt/ isnt aware of the Town = Terran thing.

_

On a few other other players.

Still not happy with Conegamers Day 1 play.

WhiteEaglePL is at the top of my Scum list because I simply dont believe his role story.

Impertinence and Truck give me extremely strong Town vibes.

Wright, I think could still be the Nuker.

I'm not sure that's good enough of an reason.

Ok thats a little weird

This post, combined with others above, don't make a lot of sense to me. Could you maybe explain a little bit more? You've already gone this far, so a little further wouldn't hurt surely. 

Im down with sparks
vote sparks

@Padib.

I think your a Townie. And your a very powerful unit, capable of knowing information about the enemy and the unit types. Your basically the oversee-er......I think.

Kinda like a spy, or general, or commander. Definitly not a simple soldier or a slightly higher ranked/specialised soldier.

I'll go into these three in more detail at some point today. For now:

Radish: Been posting very little; most of his posts are to do with the actual flavour of the game moreso than anything else and much of his play was centred around a no-lynch. So far, difficult to read. I'd put him maybe ever so slightly on the scum side but certainly nothing major.

TheProf: I've only played one game with him before and this game he's taking a completely different approach which has thrown up a couple of inconsistancies such as the whole Terran Town thing.. As with Radish, I'm not too sure what to say.

Padib: A bit of a mixture between Radish and TheProf; not posted much (though with legitimate reasoning which I cannot hold against him) and with some bizzare inconsistancies similar to that of TheProf with the whole Terran Town debacle. Also this latest power role claim rubs me up the wrong way as you could probably tell. It's a very random move; almost like he's been forced into it. That worries me.

If of these three, only one is town, at this point I would suspect Padib. However it's a long game and there's a long way to go. Will be keeping an eye on them and such when I'm not so painfully tired, ofcourse. 

You know; normally it's polite for people to give their opinion before asking for that of others. Perhaps you could provide a summary of your opinion?

Also whilst Sparks seems like the logical choice from what has been seen so far, I believe he deserves a chance to defend himself before I vote for him. I recall in the previous game he did not get said chance and was mis-lynched. Now, I don't care for what happened in previous games but everyone deserves a chance to say something. I'd like to hear what exactly Sparks' role is or clarifications for his actions before voting.

Wow, what is Padib getting at here? It's pretty bold, so I'm going to assume he's telling the truth for now.