IamAwsome said:
DonFerrari said:
Where were those methods when surface, azzure and Xbox original bombed?
|
Surface bombed because of it's price, and the fact that they are competing in a heavily contested market against Apple and several Android manufacturers. They at least have a foothold in games since Xbox is a popular brand. Tablets? Not until they release a budget tablet, and Windows 7/8 against iOS and Android doesn't exactly help that, and they have poured money into it. Azure? I don't know why that failed.
What is your measurement of success with the original Xbox? They at the very least grew it into a major brand amongst the mainstream in the face of Sony domination, something that Sega and Nintendo couldn't do.
|
Well, actually, the Xbox 360 was what built the major brand; the original Xbox was a financial flop, losing the company billions, and achieved about twenty four million units by the end of its generation, which was a fifth of its direct competitor the PS2, and a quarter of Sony's first-effort with the original Playstation. Heck, it only outsold the Gamecube by a couple of million, and part of the reason they got such an early start on the next gen was they wanted to move away from the original Xbox platform's money-burning ways as quickly as possible. The only really notable success, from a sales standpoint, the Xbox platform achieved occured after the launch of the Xbox 360, and was helped not only by the fact that they got an early start, but by the fact that their direct competitor basically kneecapped themselves in many, many ways.
Which brings us to a point Jega himself made; the PS2 had a MASSIVE amount of marketshare in its heydey, but it didn't keep the PS3 from getting its butt kicked when the seventh began. Sure, it eventually caught up to the Xbox 360, but if you compare it to its predecessor, the PS2, Sony lost a GREAT deal of territory in the seventh generation, territory it never fully recovered. While the Xbox platform, by contrast, gained a massive windfall due in part to Sony's idiocy; not that Microsoft didn't release a great console, but it helped that the PS3 was ludicrously inadequate in the opening years.
Bottom line, Microsoft did really, really unpopular things before and immediately after the Xbox One's launch. Several of their exclusives at the moment looked primed to go to PC as well, minimizing their effect at actually moving consoles. When it comes to multiplatform performance, the best they seem to get is 'Equal To The PS4,' and it hasn't even been a consistent thing. In terms of price, at the moment it is, at best, 'Equal To The PS4.' Launch time, at best, 'Equal To The PS4,' with a ten month disadvantage in secondary markets that Sony has a brand advantage in anyway. Last gen performance, at best, 'Equal To The PS3,' even with all the advantages they enjoyed last gen.
If Sony's mistakes last gen cost them marketshare, I'm failing to see why the assumption is that the Xbox platform will be completely unaffected by their mistakes. o.O
Zanten, Doer Of The Things
Unless He Forgets In Which Case Zanten, Forgetter Of The Things
Or He Procrascinates, In Which Case Zanten, Doer Of The Things Later
Or It Involves Moving Furniture, in Which Case Zanten, F*** You.