By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Should nintendo pay Ubisoft and Capcom for ports?

 

ShShould nintendo have paid Ubisoft to port The Crew and AC: Rogue and Capcom for RE: remake

Yes all three 61 28.64%
 
No to all three 103 48.36%
 
Only RE 23 10.80%
 
Only AC: Rogue 4 1.88%
 
Only The Crew 2 0.94%
 
Yes RE and AC:Rogue 13 6.10%
 
Yes RE and The Crew 2 0.94%
 
Yes AC:Rogue and The Crew 5 2.35%
 
Total:213

More money to Nintendos own games - there will not be any more AAA Third Party support on Wii U.

"English is my second language, so I apologize for any grammar errors" You do not need to apologize, your english is better than many that has english as their first language.
When comforting a grammar Nazi, I always say softly, “There, their, they’re.” ;)



Around the Network

Maybe they should pay for RE, but actually thats the only game making a little bit of sense at all.
But actually ... no, don't do it Nintendo!



YES, these games must come to the system regardless if they sell or not.



Does Sony pay? There is my awnser



I think the Wii demonstrated to Nintendo that they are better off serving as the unique alternative to Sony and Mocrosoft...
It seems they will be taking the same approach with Wii U from here on out...
Paying for ports wouldn't conplement their direction; paying for exclusive experiences will probably be more up ther ally...
Whether my personal assessment is right, whether such an approach would pay off, and whether Wii U is actually unique are all entirely different discussions...



Have a nice day...

Around the Network
luiaots said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

Nahhh, I doubt enough people on the wiiU care about either of those. If Ubisoft wants to do it, great, but Nintendo should spend the money elsewhere like making a fucking 3d Metroid game or Majoras Mask HD or Localizing Fatal Frame for NA


 Not even for RE? I know you can't compare but Resident Evil has had moderate success on Nintendo platforms like Wii and to a smaller extent 3DS

I think Nintendo should pay Capcom for the potential Resi 2 remake, but that's about it!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

I don't see the point. They are better off using the money to make their own games.



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

WolfpackN64 said:
Does Sony pay? There is my awnser

Er, what? Completely different situations. Sony doesn't pay, because they don't have to. 3rd parties want to release games on ps home consoles,as they sell well. They don't need an incentive. They do when it comes to ninty consoles. Ninty is a business and needs to figure out if their strategy is working or not. It seems to me that it isn't. I don't see how they can be happy with such sales.



WolfpackN64 said:
Does Sony pay? There is my awnser


Sony does official bundles with 3rd party multiplat games with joint million dollar worldwide advertising campaigns. 



baloofarsan said:

"English is my second language, so I apologize for any grammar errors" You do not need to apologize, your english is better than many that has english as their first language.
When comforting a grammar Nazi, I always say softly, “There, their, they’re.” ;)

Thanks! I re-read my post several times to make sure I didd't make any mistakes. 

On topic. I wonder how much those games would have to sell to break even



I am a nintendo fan, not a nintendo fanboy